§
Local 212, UAW

12 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    190 F.2d 429 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 52 times

    No. 21395. Argued June 14, 1951. Decided July 13, 1951. Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and FRANK and L. HAND, Circuit Judges. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for the respondent. L. HAND, Circuit Judge. By a divided vote we decided this appeal last year upon the same record that is now before us, holding that the Board's order should be "enforced." The Supreme Court vacated our order and remanded the cause to us for reconsideration in two

  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. James Thompson

    208 F.2d 743 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 41 times
    Reinstating ALJ's findings after Board reversal

  6. American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 38 times
    In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  8. United States v. Palermo

    258 F.2d 397 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 10 times

    No. 388, Docket 25085. Argued June 3, 1958. Decided August 18, 1958. Wyllys S. Newcomb, New York City (Royall, Koegel, Harris Caskey, John A. Wells, Robert E. Frisch, Andrew L. Clark and Burton N. Bromson, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Earl J. McHugh, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., and Charles H. Miller, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-respondent. Before HINCKS, PICKETT and MOORE, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed

    206 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13310. June 22, 1953. As Amended August 12, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls and Ruth C. Goldman, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent George W. Reed. Watson A. Garoni, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent In. Hod Carriers, etc. Before STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges, and McCORMICK, District

  10. Modern Motors v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    198 F.2d 925 (8th Cir. 1952)   Cited 9 times

    No. 14476. September 16, 1952. Robert A. Brown, Jr., St. Joseph, Mo. (Brown, Douglas Brown, St. Joseph, Mo., on the brief), for petitioner. Irving M. Herman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Bernard Dunau, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN and COLLET, Circuit Judges. JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge. This case, like National Labor Relations Board v. J.I

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"