Local 147 Laborer's International Union of North America (Northeast Remsco Construction, Inc.,)

12 Cited authorities

  1. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum
  2. U.S. v. Payton

    159 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 175 times
    Holding courts can look beyond the elements of the offense to determine whether the conviction rested upon facts establishing dishonesty or false statement.
  3. Zinman v. Black Decker (U.S.), Inc.

    983 F.2d 431 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 68 times
    Holding that the district court properly admitted an eighteen-year-old conviction for Medicare fraud because the district court found that "making a false statement to a government agency is a crime akin to perjury, . . . that conviction . . . bore heavily on his credibility, . . . [and that his] credibility was highly relevant to several disputed issues in the case"
  4. United States v. Wilson

    715 F.2d 1164 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that while "private communications between jurors and others are presumptively prejudicial [t]here can be no prejudice . . . in the absence of any such communication."
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Bus Transit

    577 F.3d 467 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 16 times
    Interpreting similar language in 29 C.F.R. § 101.10 as meaning "that the Board's procedures are to be controlled by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as far as practicable" (cleaned up)
  6. United States v. Babb

    874 F.3d 1027 (8th Cir. 2017)   Cited 3 times
    Finding the district court "acted well within its discretion when it excluded" stale convictions because they attacked the witness's character for truthfulness
  7. Erickson Trucking Serv., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    929 F.3d 393 (6th Cir. 2019)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 18-2283/2380 07-10-2019 ERICKSON TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. ARGUED: Matthew M. O'Rourke, MILLER JOHNSON, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent. Ruth E. Burdick, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. ON BRIEF: Matthew M. O'Rourke, Keith E. Eastland, MILLER JOHNSON, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent. Ruth E. Burdick, David

  8. Adv. Sth. Suburban Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    468 F.3d 1038 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 06-1346, 06-1511. Argued September 8, 2006. Decided November 21, 2006. Appeal from the Employer petitioned for review of, and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Douglas A. Darch (argued), Seyfarth Shaw, Chicago, IL, for Advocate South Suburban Hosp., Petitioner. David Seid (argued), Aileen Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for N.L.R.B., Respondent. Michael H. Slutsky (argued), N. Elizabeth Reynolds, Allison, Slutsky Kennedy, Chicago,

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, AFL, Local 823

    227 F.2d 439 (10th Cir. 1955)   Cited 2 times

    No. 5092. November 12, 1955. Franklin C. Milliken, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Elizabeth W. Weston, Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Daniel J. Leary, Joplin, Mo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, HUXMAN, Circuit Judge, and SAVAGE, District Judge. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board

  10. Rule 609 - Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction

    Fed. R. Evid. 609   Cited 4,534 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a ten-year time limit, absent unusual circumstances, on the use of prior convictions for impeachment purposes
  11. Rule 608 - A Witness's Character for Truthfulness or Untruthfulness

    Fed. R. Evid. 608   Cited 3,074 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Assuming it was otherwise admissible
  12. Section 1029 - Fraud and related activity in connection with access devices

    18 U.S.C. § 1029   Cited 2,365 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing conspiracy to commit access device fraud