§

Local 12419, Mine Workers

176 N.L.R.B. 628 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Local 12419, Mine Workers

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."

  4. Labor Board v. Rockaway News Co.

    345 U.S. 71 (1953)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that employees may bargain away their statutory right to strike

  5. Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.

    306 U.S. 332 (1939)   Cited 139 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.

  6. American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 38 times
    In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

  7. Teamsters, Chauffeurs Helpers v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 1011 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times

    No. 16415. Argued November 12, 1963. Decided December 5, 1963. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., with whom

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Maritime Union of America

    175 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 40 times
    Bargaining for discriminatory hiring hall clause

  9. Roberts v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 427 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times

    No. 18942. Argued March 4, 1965. Decided July 21, 1965. Mr. Theodore J. St. Antoine, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. J. Albert Woll and Robert C. Mayer, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before FAHY, DANAHER and McGOWAN, Circuit Judges. FAHY, Circuit Judge. The

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Philadelphia Iron Works, Inc.

    211 F.2d 937 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    Noting that hiring practices after a grievance was filed "would be a factor for the board's consideration" but that the NLRB easily could reason that subsequent hiring practices were reactionary to the grievance and did not accurately reflect the prior hiring arrangement