§
Local 952

9 Cited authorities

  1. Teachers v. Hudson

    475 U.S. 292 (1986)   Cited 408 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment restrains government-compelled exactions of money

  2. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 277 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  4. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

  5. Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    473 U.S. 95 (1985)   Cited 76 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  7. Penrod v. N.L.R.B

    203 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 13 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Hudson requires a union to explain how its affiliate used money that was ultimately charged to the nonmembers

  8. Shea v. Intl. Ass'n. Machine Aerospace

    154 F.3d 508 (5th Cir. 1998)   Cited 13 times
    Allowing opt-out requirement under the RLA

  9. Lutz v. Intern. Ass'n of Machinists, Aerospace

    121 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. Va. 2000)   Cited 4 times
    Acknowledging that "scrutiny under the First Amendment is significantly more rigorous and less deferential than [duty of fair representation] review"