§

Lithographers Local One-L (Metropolitan Lithographers Assn.)

352 N.L.R.B. 906 (N.L.R.B. 2008)
Lithographers Local One-L (Metropolitan Lithographers Assn.)

13 Cited authorities

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. Salsbury Industries v. U.S.

    498 U.S. 1024 (1991)   Cited 81 times
    Construing the Torncello holding

  4. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  6. DTR Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    39 F.3d 106 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 17 times
    In DTR I, the predictions made were about possible lost business in the face of unionization, contained in a letter from the employer's president to its employees shortly before a union election.

  7. Sonicraft, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    905 F.2d 146 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 19 times
    Applying Redd-I

  8. Prudential Insurance Company of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    412 F.2d 77 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 34 times
    Recognizing that bargaining obligation "extends to . . . the administration of [CBAs] already adopted"

  9. Chesapeake Potomac Telephone Co. v. N.L.R.B

    687 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that waiver of statutory rights can be effectuated only if "intent to waive is clear and unmistakable from the evidence presented"

  10. Hertz Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    105 F.3d 868 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 3 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 95-3621, 96-3000 Argued June 11, 1996. Opinion Filed January 28, 1997. As Amended February 6, 1997. Frank B. Shuster (Argued), Costangy, Brooks Smith, L.L.C., Atlanta, for Petitioner. Peter Winkler, Supervisory Attorney, Vincent J. Falvo, Jr. (Argued), Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, United