§

Lincoln Eastern Management Corporation

364 NLRB No. 16 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
Lincoln Eastern Management Corporation

7 Cited authorities

  1. Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank v. Roper

    445 U.S. 326 (1980)   Cited 1,000 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denial of class certification is appealable after entry of final judgment

  2. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 141 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

  3. Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc.

    702 F.3d 1050 (8th Cir. 2013)   Cited 118 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Finding plaintiff failed to identify anything "in either the text or legislative history of the FLSA that indicates a congressional intent to bar employees from agreeing to arbitrate FLSA claims individually, nor is there an 'inherent conflict' between the FLSA and the FAA"

  4. Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 66 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA

  5. Patterson v. Raymours Furniture Co.

    96 F. Supp. 3d 71 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)   Cited 53 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that arbitration provision in employee handbook was enforceable agreement to arbitrate and that "[i]t is well-settled that revisions to an employee handbook are binding when the employee continues to work after receiving notice of the revisions"

  6. Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC

    152 F. Supp. 3d 1243 (C.D. Cal. 2016)   Cited 26 times
    Applying California law

  7. Nanavati v. Adecco USA, Inc.

    99 F. Supp. 3d 1072 (N.D. Cal. 2015)   Cited 21 times
    Finding the defendant's burden to establish the existence of a valid agreement satisfied where the defendant offered a detailed, unopposed declaration establishing that plaintiff did electronically sign the agreement, and the plaintiff did not "challenge the authenticity of his signature or the prima facie validity of the arbitration agreement," nor did the plaintiff offer evidence to suggest that he did not sign the agreement