Laundry, Linen Supply & Dry Cleaning Drivers

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Truck Drivers

    228 F.2d 791 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 22 times

    No. 15651. January 17, 1956. Irving M. Herman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Fred W. Elarbee, Jr., Edwin M. Pearce, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., Poole, Pearce Hall, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and BROWN, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit

  2. Bright v. Pittsburgh Musical Society, American Federation of Musicians, Local Sixty

    379 Pa. 335 (Pa. 1954)   Cited 8 times

    October 4, 1954. November 8, 1954. Courts — Jurisdiction — Equity — Enjoining secondary boycott — Multiplicity of suits — Labor law — Words phrases — Labor dispute — Restatement, Torts — Right to work — Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act — Labor Anti-Injunction Act. 1. A "labor dispute", as defined in § 3(c) of the Labor Anti-Injunction Act of June 2, 1937, P. L. 1198, as amended, and in § 3(h) of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act of June 1, 1937, P. L. 1168, as amended, is a controversy concerning

  3. Fehr Baking Co. v. Bakers' Union

    20 F. Supp. 691 (W.D. La. 1937)   Cited 3 times

    No. 754. August 23, 1937. John H. Benckenstein and Jack M. Moore, both of Beaumont, Tex., for complainant. Thos. A. Edwards, of Lake Charles, La., for respondents. In Equity. Injunction proceeding by the Fehr Baking Company against a Bakers' Union and others. Preliminary writ granted. DAWKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, alleging that it had qualified to do business in this state, brought this suit against the local bakers' union of Lake Charles, Louisiana, "with Pat Trahan