Laimbeer Packaging Co., LLC

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

May 30, 2003

339 N.L.R.B. 177 (N.L.R.B. 2003)

LAIMBEER PACKAGING CO., LLC 177
Laimbeer Packaging Company, LLC and Local 6-
1001, Pace International Union, AFL–CIO and
Local 6-0421, Pace International Union, AFL–
CIO. Cases 7–CA–44736 and 7–CA–45174
May 30, 2003
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN BATTISTA AND MEMBERS LIEBMAN
AND WALSH
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent has withdrawn its
answer and is not contesting the allegations of the
amended consolidated complaint. Upon charges filed by
Local 6-1001, Pace International Union, AFL–CIO
(Charging Union 6-1001) and Local 6-0421, Pace Inter-
national Union, AFL–CIO (Charging Union 6-0421)
(collectively the Unions), on January 15 and May 31,
2002, the General Counsel issued an amended consoli-
dated complaint on August 30, 2002, against Laimbeer
Packaging Company, LLC (the Respondent), alleging
that it has violated Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.
The Respondent filed an answer and amended answer
to the original complaint in Case 7–CA–44736. How-
ever, on September 5, 2002, after issuance of the
amended consolidated complaint, the Respondent filed a
withdrawal of answer, stating that it does not contest the
allegations in the amended consolidated complaint.
On October 1, 2002, the General Counsel filed a Mo-
tion for Default Judgment with the Board. On October 3,
2002, the Board issued an order transferring the proceed-
ing to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the
motion should not be granted. The Respondent filed no
response. The allegations in the motion are therefore
undisputed.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in the complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is
shown. In addition, the amended consolidated complaint
affirmatively states that unless an answer is filed within
14 days of service, all the allegations in the amended
consolidated complaint will be considered admitted.
Although the Respondent answered the original and
amended complaints in Case 7–CA–44736, it subse-
quently withdrew its answer, stating that it did not con-
test the allegations in the amended consolidated com-
plaint. The withdrawal of an answer has the same effect
as a failure to file an answer, i.e., the allegations in the
amended consolidated complaint must be considered to
be true.1
Accordingly, we grant the General Counsel’s Motion
for Default Judgment.2
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation,
with an office and place of business at 25445 W. Outer
Drive, Melvindale, Michigan, and a place of business at
1409 E. Pierson Road, Flint, Michigan (the Respondent’s
Melvindale and Flint facilities, respectively), has been
engaged in the manufacture, nonretail sale, and distribu-
tion of corrugated boxes. The Respondent’s Melvindale
and Flint facilities are both involved in this proceeding.
During the calendar year ending December 31, 2001, the
Respondent, in conducting its business operations de-
scribed above, received gross revenues in excess of
$500,000, and purchased and received at its Melvindale
and Flint, Michigan facilities goods valued in excess of
$50,000 directly from points outside the State of Michi-
gan.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and that the Unions are labor organizations
within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
The following employees of the Respondent constitute
units appropriate for the purposes of collective bargain-
ing within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act.

Unit 1: All full-time and regular part-time pro-
duction and maintenance employees employed by
the Respondent at its Melvindale facility; but ex-
cluding office clerical employees, sales employees,
technical employees, professional employees, guards
and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Unit 2: All full-time and regular part-time pro-
duction and maintenance employees employed by
the Respondent at its Flint facility; but excluding of-
fice clerical employees, sales employees, technical

1 See Maislin Transport, 274 NLRB 529 (1985).
2 The allegations in the Motion for Default Judgment disclose that on
June 5, 2002, the Respondent filed an Involuntary Petition for Bank-
ruptcy with the United States Bankruptcy Court in Michigan-Detroit. It
is well established that the institution of bankruptcy proceedings does
not deprive the Board of jurisdiction or authority to entertain and proc-
ess an unfair labor practice case to its final disposition. Phoenix Co.,
274 NLRB 995 (1985). Board proceedings fall within the exception to
the automatic stay provisions for proceedings by a governmental unit to
enforce its police or regulatory powers. See id., and cases cited therein.
Accord: NLRB v. Continental Hagen Corp., 932 F.2d 828, 834–835
(9th Cir. 1991).
339 NLRB No. 28
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 178
employees, professional employees, guards and su-
pervisors as defined in the Act.

At all material times, Charging Union 6-1001 has been
the designated exclusive collective-bargaining represen-
tative of unit 1 and has been recognized as the represen-
tative by the Respondent. This recognition has been em-
bodied in a collective-bargaining agreement effective
from April 1, 1994, through March 31, 2004.
At all material times, Charging Union 6-0421 has been
the designated exclusive collective-bargaining represen-
tative of unit 2 and has been recognized as the represen-
tative by the Respondent. This recognition has been em-
bodied in an agreement effective from January 6, 1997,
through December 31, 2001.
At all material times, based on Section 9(a) of the Act,
the Charging Unions have been the respective exclusive
collective-bargaining representatives of units 1 and 2.
The collective-bargaining agreements described above
provide, inter alia, for holiday pay, vacation pay, sick-
ness and accident benefits, and union-security and dues
checkoff.
About December 11, 2001, the Respondent laid off the
majority of unit 1 employees and announced that it
would close the Melvindale facility shortly afterwards.
About the same date, the Respondent closed its Flint
place of business and terminated its unit 2 employees.
Since about December 11, 2001, and continuing to
date, the Respondent failed to continue in effect all the
terms and conditions of the collective-bargaining agree-
ments described above by failing to pay, inter alia, holi-
day pay, vacation pay, and sickness and accident bene-
fits.
Since about December 2001, the Respondent has failed
to forward to the Charging Unions the dues deducted
from the paychecks of employees in the two units.
The Respondent engaged in all of the conduct de-
scribed above without the Charging Unions’ consent and
without affording the Charging Unions notice or a mean-
ingful opportunity to bargain with the Respondent with
respect to the effects of its actions. The subjects de-
scribed above are mandatory subjects for collective bar-
gaining.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Respon-
dent has failed and refused to bargain collectively and in
good faith with the exclusive collective-bargaining repre-
sentatives of its employees within the meaning of Section
8(d) of the Act, and has thereby engaged in unfair labor
practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Sec-
tion 8(a)(5) and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, to remedy
the Respondent’s unlawful failure and refusal to bargain
with the Unions about the effects of the Respondent’s
decision to close its Melvindale and Flint facilities and
layoff or terminate unit employees, we shall order the
Respondent to bargain with the Unions, on request, about
the effects of those decisions. Because of the Respon-
dent’s unlawful conduct, however, the laid-off and ter-
minated employees in units 1 and 2 have been denied an
opportunity to bargain through their collective-
bargaining representative. Meaningful bargaining cannot
be assured until some measure of economic strength is
restored to the Unions. A bargaining order alone, there-
fore, cannot serve as an adequate remedy for the unfair
labor practices committed.
Accordingly, we deem it necessary, in order to ensure
that meaningful bargaining occurs and to effectuate the
policies of the Act, to accompany our Order with a lim-
ited backpay requirement designed to make whole the
employees for losses suffered as a result of the violations
and to re-create in some practicable manner a situation in
which the parties’ bargaining position is not entirely de-
void of economic consequences for the Respondent. We
shall do so by ordering the Respondent to pay backpay to
the laid-off and terminated employees in a manner simi-
lar to that required in Transmarine Navigation Corp.,
170 NLRB 389 (1968),3 as clarified by Melody Toyota,
325 NLRB 846 (1998).
Thus, the Respondent shall pay its laid-off and termi-
nated employees backpay at the rate of their normal
wages when last in the Respondent’s employ from 5 days
after the date of this Decision and Order until occurrence
of the earliest of the following conditions: (1) the date
the Respondent bargains to agreement with the Unions
on those subjects pertaining to the effects of the closing
of its facility on its employees; (2) a bona fide impasse in
bargaining; (3) the Unions’ failure to request bargaining
within 5 business days after receipt of this Decision and
Order, or to commence negotiations within 5 days after
receipt days of the Respondent’s notice of its desire to
bargain with the Unions; or (4) the Unions’ subsequent
failure to bargain in good faith.
In no event shall the sum paid to these employees ex-
ceed the amount they would have earned as wages from
the date on which they were laid off or terminated to the
time they secured equivalent employment elsewhere, or

3 See also Live Oak Skilled Care & Manor, 300 NLRB 1040 (1990).

LAIMBEER PACKAGING CO. LLC 179
the date on which the Respondent shall have offered to
bargain in good faith, whichever occurs sooner. How-
ever, in no event shall this sum be less than the employ-
ees would have earned for a 2-week period at the rate of
their normal wages when last in the Respondent’s em-
ploy. Backpay shall be based on earnings which the laid-
off or terminated employees would normally have re-
ceived during the applicable period, less any net interim
earnings, and shall be computed in accordance with F.
W. Woolworth Co., 90 NLRB 289 (1950), with interest
as prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, 283
NLRB 1173 (1987).
In addition, having found that the Respondent violated
Section 8(a)(5) and (1) since December 11, 2001, by
failing and refusing to continue in effect all the terms and
conditions of the collective-bargaining agreement by
failing to pay, inter alia, holiday pay, vacation pay, and
sickness and accident benefits on behalf of its employees
in units 1 and 2, we shall order the Respondent to make
whole its unit employees for any loss of earnings and
other benefits they have suffered as a result. In addition,
we shall order the Respondent to make all contractually
required benefit fund contributions that have not been
made since that date, including any additional amounts
due the funds in accordance with Merryweather Optical
Co., 240 NLRB 1213, 1216 fn. 6 (1979). The Respon-
dent shall also reimburse unit employees for any ex-
penses ensuing from its failure to make the required con-
tributions, as set forth in Kraft Plumbing & Heating, 252
NLRB 891 fn. 2 (1980), enfd. 661 F.2d 940 (9th Cir.
1981).4 All payments to the unit employees shall be
computed in accordance with Ogle Protection Service,
183 NLRB 682 (1970), enfd. 444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir.
1971), with interest as prescribed in New Horizons for
the Retarded, supra.5

4 To the extent that an employee has made personal contributions to
a fund that are accepted by the fund in lieu of the employer’s delin-
quent contributions during the period of the delinquency, the Respon-
dent will reimburse the employee, but the amount of such delinquency
will constitute a setoff to the amount that the Respondent otherwise
owes the fund.
5 Inasmuch as the Flint facility was closed on the same date as the
Respondent ceased paying contractually required benefits (December
11, 2001), the Respondent shall only be required to make whole the
employees at that facility and the funds for benefits that had accrued
prior to the date of closure. It is unclear from the complaint, however,
whether the Respondent’s Melvindale facility closed on December 11,
2001, or sometime thereafter. The complaint alleges only that the
Respondent laid off a majority of its employees at that facility on De-
cember 11, 2001, and announced that the facility would be closed
shortly afterwards. With respect to those employees at the Melvindale
facility who were laid off on December 11, 2001, the Respondent’s
obligation to make whole the employees and the funds shall be the
same as at the Flint facility, i.e., the Respondent’s obligation shall be
limited to paying benefits and making benefit fund contributions that
Further, having found that the Respondent has failed
since December 2001, to remit to the Unions the dues
deducted from the paychecks of employees in the two
units, we shall order the Respondent to forward such
withheld dues to the Unions as required by the April 1,
1994—March 31, 2004 and January 6, 1997—December
31, 2001 collective-bargaining agreements, with interest
as prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, supra.
Finally, in view of the fact that the Respondent’s Flint
facility is closed, and that the Respondent announced its
intention to close the Melvindale facility, we shall order
the Respondent to mail a copy of the attached notice to
the Unions and to the last known addresses of the unit
employees who were employed by the Respondent when
it closed or announced the closure of its Flint and Mel-
vindale facilities on December 11, 2001, in order to in-
form them of the outcome of this proceeding.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the Re-
spondent, Laimbeer Packaging Company, LLC, Melvin-
dale and Flint, Michigan, its officers, agents, successors,
and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to bargain collectively and in
good faith with Local 6-1001, Pace International Union,
AFL–CIO and Local 6-0421, Pace International Union,
AFL–CIO, as the respective exclusive collective-
bargaining representatives for the units described below,
concerning the effects on the unit employees of its deci-
sion to close its Melvindale and Flint, Michigan facilities,
and the resulting layoff and termination of the unit em-
ployees. The units are:

Unit 1: All full-time and regular part-time produc-
tion and maintenance employees employed by the Re-
spondent at its Melvindale facility; but excluding of-
fice clerical employees, sales employees, technical
employees, professional employees, guards and su-
pervisors as defined in the Act.
Unit 2: All full-time and regular part-time pro-
duction and maintenance employees employed by
the Respondent at its Flint facility; but excluding of-
fice clerical employees, sales employees, technical
employees, professional employees, guards and su-
pervisors as defined in the Act.

had accrued before the layoff. However, as to unit employees, if any,
who continued to be employed at the Melvindale facility after Decem-
ber 11, 2001, the Respondent’s obligation to make whole those em-
ployees and the funds would continue during the term of the April 1,
1994—March 30, 2004 agreement and thereafter, absent a new agree-
ment or impasse, until such time as the employees were laid off or the
facility closed.

DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 180
(b) Failing to continue in effect all the terms and condi-
tions of its collective-bargaining agreements with the Un-
ions by failing to pay, inter alia, holiday pay, vacation pay,
and sickness and accident benefits.
(c) Failing to remit to the Unions dues that have been
deducted from the employees’ paychecks pursuant to the
terms of the collective-bargaining agreements.
(d) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to ef-
fectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Unions over the effects
on employees in units 1 and 2 of its decision to close its
Melvindale and Flint, Michigan facilities and lay off and
terminate the unit employees, and reduce to writing and
sign any agreement reached as a result of such bargaining.
(b) Pay the laid-off or terminated employees in the units
described above their normal wages when last in the Re-
spondent’s employ from 5 days after the date of this Deci-
sion and Order until the occurrence of the earliest of the
following conditions: (1) the date the Respondent bar-
gains to agreement with the Unions on those subjects per-
taining to the effects of the closing of its facility on its
employees; (2) a bona fide impasse in bargaining; (3) the
Unions’ failure to request bargaining within 5 business
days after receipt of this Decision and Order, or to com-
mence negotiations within 5 days after receipt of the Re-
spondent’s notice of its desire to bargain with the Unions;
or (4) the Unions’ subsequent failure to bargain in good
faith; but in no event shall the sum paid to any of the em-
ployees exceed the amount they would have earned as
wages from the date on which they were laid off or termi-
nated to the time they secured equivalent employment
elsewhere, or the date on which the Respondent shall have
offered to bargain in good faith, whichever occurs sooner;
provided, however, that in no event shall this sum be less
than the employees would have earned for a 2-week period
at the rate of their normal wages when last in the Respon-
dent’s employ, with interest, as set forth in the remedy
section of this decision.
(c) Make the employees in units 1 and 2 whole for any
loss of earnings or other benefits by paying, inter alia,
holiday pay, vacation pay, and sickness and accident bene-
fits pursuant to the collective-bargaining agreements that
have not been paid since December 11, 2001, with inter-
est, as described in the remedy section of this decision.
(d) Make all the contractually required benefit fund con-
tributions, if any, that have not been made on behalf of the
employees in units 1 and 2 since December 11, 2001, and
reimburse unit employees for any expenses ensuing from
its failure to make the required contributions, with interest,
in the manner set forth in the remedy section of this deci-
sion.
(e) Remit to the Unions dues that have been deducted
from employees’ earnings, with interest, as set forth in the
remedy section of this decision.
(f) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place desig-
nated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, social
security payment records, timecards, personnel records
and reports, and all other records including an electronic
copy of such records if stored in electronic form, necessary
to analyze the amount of backpay due under the terms of
this Order.
(g) Within 14 days after service by the Region, dupli-
cate and mail, at its own expense and after being signed
by the Respondent’s authorized representative, copies of
the attached notice marked “Appendix”6 to all unit em-
ployees who were employed by the Respondent at the
time that it closed or announced the closure of its Flint
and Melvindale, Michigan facilities on December 11,
2001.
(h) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
MAILED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government

The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to mail and obey
this notice.

FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO

Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.

6 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Mailed by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Mailed pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”

LAIMBEER PACKAGING CO. LLC 181
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to bargain collectively and
in good faith with Local 6-1001, Pace International Un-
ion, AFL–CIO and Local 6-0421, Pace International Un-
ion, AFL–CIO, as the exclusive collective-bargaining
representatives for the units described below, concerning
the effects on unit employees of our decision to close our
Melvindale and Flint, Michigan facilities, and the result-
ing layoff and termination of the unit employees.

Unit 1: All full-time and regular part-time produc-
tion and maintenance employees employed by us at
our Melvindale facility; but excluding office clerical
employees, sales employees, technical employees,
professional employees, guards and supervisors as de-
fined in the Act.
Unit 2: All full-time and regular part-time pro-
duction and maintenance employees employed by us
at our Flint facility; but excluding office clerical em-
ployees, sales employees, technical employees, pro-
fessional employees, guards and supervisors as de-
fined in the Act.

WE WILL NOT fail to continue in effect all the terms and
conditions of the collective-bargaining agreements by
failing to pay, inter alia, holiday pay, vacation pay, and
sickness and accident benefits.
WE WILL NOT fail to remit to the Unions dues that were
deducted from the employees’ paychecks pursuant to the
terms and conditions of the collective-bargaining agree-
ments.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Unions over the
effects on employees in units 1 and 2 of our decision to
close our Melvindale and Flint, Michigan facilities, and
to lay off and terminate the unit employees, and reduce
to writing and sign any agreement reached as a result of
such bargaining.
WE WILL pay the laid-off or terminated employees in
both units 1 and 2 limited backpay in connection with
our failure to bargain over the effects of our decision to
close the Melvindale and Flint, Michigan facilities and to
lay off and terminate employees, as required in the Deci-
sion and Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
WE WILL make the employees in both units 1 and 2
whole for any loss of earnings or other benefits by pay-
ing, among other things, the holiday pay, vacation pay,
and sickness and accident benefits that have not been
paid since December 11, 2001, with interest.
WE WILL make all the contractually required benefit
fund contributions, if any, that have not been made on
behalf of unit employees since December 11, 2001, and
reimburse the employees in units 1 and 2 for any ex-
penses ensuing from our failure to make the required
contributions, with interest.
WE WILL remit to the Unions the dues that were de-
ducted from employees’ earnings, with interest.

LAIMBEER PACKAGING COMPANY, LLC