Laidlaw Waste Systems Of Michigan, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Anserphone, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    632 F.2d 4 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 3 times
    In Anserphone, we refused enforcement in the absence of evidence on the record "to indicate that the employee who furnished the company representative with a copy of the affidavit she submitted to the board did so out of any fear, rather it appears she did it in the spirit of cooperation."
  2. Local 749, Int. Bro. of Boilermakers, v. NLRB

    466 F.2d 343 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 6 times

    No. 71-2006. June 30, 1972. Rehearing Denied August 16, 1972. Messrs. Charles P. Scully and Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., were on the brief for petitioner. Messrs. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Joseph E. Mayer and William H. DuRoss, III, Attys., N.L.R.B., were on the brief for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before McGOWAN, LEVENTHAL and MacKINNON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Petitioner Union challenges the National Labor Relations

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Midwest Transfer Co.

    287 F.2d 443 (3d Cir. 1961)   Cited 3 times

    No. 13288. Argued December 1, 1960. Decided February 13, 1961. Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Helen F. Humphrey, Washington, D.C. (Josephine H. Klein, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent, Midwest Transfer Co. of Ill. Ben Paul Jubelirer, Pittsburgh

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shawnee Milling Co.

    184 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 9 times

    No. 3906. August 4, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, and Abraham H. Maller, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. Kenneth Abernathy, Shawnee, Okla. (G.C. Abernathy, Shawnee, Okla., on the brief) for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding under Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Board Act, 29 U.S.C