§

Laborers Local 135 (Bechtel Power Corp.)

301 N.L.R.B. 1066 (N.L.R.B. 1991)
Laborers Local 135 (Bechtel Power Corp.)

17 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 433

    600 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that "[t]he Board may properly find an unfair labor practice when the issue has been fully litigated even though not specifically pleaded in the complaint"

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 925

    460 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 37 times

    No. 71-2158. May 17, 1972. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Stanley R. Zirkin, Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., Thomas A. Capelle, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: The

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Midwest Hanger Co.

    550 F.2d 1101 (8th Cir. 1977)   Cited 19 times

    No. 76-1261. Submitted November, 11, 1976. Decided March 3, 1977. David A. Fleischer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. John A. McGuinn, Farmer, Shibley McGuinn Flood, Washington, D.C., for respondents; Guy Farmer, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Appeal

  9. Bagel Bakers Council of Greater N.Y. v. NLRB

    555 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that costs should not be shifted "from the employers to the employees harmed by illegal conduct"

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 483 & Local 11, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers

    672 F.2d 1159 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 8 times

    No. 81-1353. Argued October 27, 1981. Decided February 9, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, Sandra Shands Elligers, Eric Moskowitz (argued), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John J. Mulvihill (argued), Nolan, Bell Moore, Mantoloking, N. J., for respondents. Before ADAMS, VAN DUSEN and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT VAN DUSEN, Senior