Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 872

9 Cited authorities

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
573 U.S. 682 (2014) Cited 788 times 50 Legal Analyses
Holding that regulation at issue created a "substantial burden" under RFRA because the governmental action threatened penalties against religiously adherent employers who refused to provide contraceptive care as part of their heath provision plans, and therefore involved "coercion"
Pahls v. Thomas
718 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2013) Cited 751 times
Holding a First Amendment claim can survive summary judgment even when the government selectively enforced the law on a single day
Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car
522 U.S. 948 (1997) Cited 104 times
Holding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula
United States v. Perea–Rey
680 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 2012) Cited 197 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding a border patrol agent intruded into an area of curtilage where uninvited visitors would not be expected to appear to stop an individual suspected of entering the country illegally
Cloe v. City of Indianapolis
712 F.3d 1171 (7th Cir. 2013) Cited 187 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer reasonably accommodated an employee even though the employer took some three months to provide any accommodation and an additional two months to provide the employee's requested accommodation
520 S. Mich. Ave. Assocs., Ltd. v. Unite Here Local 1
760 F.3d 708 (7th Cir. 2014) Cited 22 times
Affirming that phone calls from supporters of a union during a labor dispute with a hotel employer to a neutral party that led to the neutral party cancelling its arrangement with the hotel to rent meeting space were persuasive but not coercive
New Breed Leasing Corp. v. N.L.R.B
111 F.3d 1460 (9th Cir. 1997) Cited 17 times
Holding that an ALJ's credibility determinations will be upheld by the court “unless they are ‘inherently incredible or patently unreasonable’ ”
Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts
Fed. R. Evid. 201 Cited 29,633 times 26 Legal Analyses
Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."
Section 1988 - Proceedings in vindication of civil rights
42 U.S.C. § 1988 Cited 22,166 times 45 Legal Analyses
Finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1920 defines the term "costs" as used in Rule 54(d) and enumerates the expenses that a federal court may tax as a cost under the discretionary authority granted in Rule 54(d)

Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 872

9 Cited authorities

Holding that regulation at issue created a "substantial burden" under RFRA because the governmental action threatened penalties against religiously adherent employers who refused to provide contraceptive care as part of their heath provision plans, and therefore involved "coercion"

Holding a First Amendment claim can survive summary judgment even when the government selectively enforced the law on a single day

Holding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula

Holding a border patrol agent intruded into an area of curtilage where uninvited visitors would not be expected to appear to stop an individual suspected of entering the country illegally

Holding that an employer reasonably accommodated an employee even though the employer took some three months to provide any accommodation and an additional two months to provide the employee's requested accommodation

Affirming that phone calls from supporters of a union during a labor dispute with a hotel employer to a neutral party that led to the neutral party cancelling its arrangement with the hotel to rent meeting space were persuasive but not coercive

Holding that an ALJ's credibility determinations will be upheld by the court “unless they are ‘inherently incredible or patently unreasonable’ ”

Finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1920 defines the term "costs" as used in Rule 54(d) and enumerates the expenses that a federal court may tax as a cost under the discretionary authority granted in Rule 54(d)