Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.

19 Cited authorities

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,675 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Associated Press v. Labor Board
301 U.S. 103 (1937) Cited 257 times
Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"
Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board
323 U.S. 248 (1944) Cited 162 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ace Comb Co.
342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965) Cited 32 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Ace Comb Co., 342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965) and N.L.R.B. v. Bird Machine Co., 161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947), where instructions to supervisory employees not to make coercive statements did not relieve employer of imputed liability it is indicated that it might be otherwise if these instructions had been communicated to the employees.
Indiana Metal Products v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
202 F.2d 613 (7th Cir. 1953) Cited 48 times
No. 10717. March 10, 1953. Edward J. Fahy and Shultz Fahy, Rockford, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel and Ruth V. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the Indiana Metal Products Corporation
N.L.R.B. v. Electric Steam Radiator Corp.
321 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 28 times
Containing similar language
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Condenser Corp.
128 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1942) Cited 62 times
No. 7683. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided March 25, 1942. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Condenser Corporation of America and Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation, and Electrical Condensers Union, Local B-1041, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor. A petition for leave to adduce additional evidence was filed. Petition for an enforcing decree granted with
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward
157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946) Cited 50 times
In NLRB v. Montgomery Ward Co., 157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946), the employees remained on their job but refused to handle any clerical work originating from another of the employer's plants which was on strike.
N.L.R.B. v. Flemingsburg Manufacturing Co.
300 F.2d 182 (6th Cir. 1962) Cited 14 times
No. 14668. March 21, 1962. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Douglas G. Cole, Cincinnati, Ohio (Lloyd A. MacDonald, Asa R. Little, Jr., Flemingsburg, Ky., on the brief), for respondent. Before O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and DARR and THORNTON, District Judges. PER CURIAM. This matter involves enforcement of an Order of the NLRB entered May 12, 1961
Section 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
18 U.S.C. § 1505 Cited 614 times 20 Legal Analyses
Providing criminal punishment for person who corruptly obstructs or endeavors to obstruct "due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States"

Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.

19 Cited authorities

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"

Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

Containing similar language

In NLRB v. Montgomery Ward Co., 157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946), the employees remained on their job but refused to handle any clerical work originating from another of the employer's plants which was on strike.

Providing criminal punishment for person who corruptly obstructs or endeavors to obstruct "due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States"