14 Cited authorities
Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 311 times 8 Legal AnalysesHolding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
441 U.S. 488 (1979) Cited 288 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer
Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
Broth. of Locomotive Eng. v. Burlington N
838 F.2d 1087 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 26 timesReviewing different formulations used in the Ninth Circuit
N.L.R.B. v. Southern Florida Hotel
751 F.2d 1571 (11th Cir. 1985) Cited 17 timesNo. 83-5452. February 8, 1985. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Barbara A. Atkin, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph H. Kaplan, Kaplan, Sicking, Hessen, Sugarman, Rosenthal De Castro, Miami, Fla., for Hotel, Motel, Restaurant Hi-Rise Employees Bartenders Union, Local 355, AFL-CIO. Joel I. Keiler, McLean, Va., for Southern Beau. Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg Casey, Carl A. Schwarz, Jr., New York City, for Estate of Kaskel, et al. Application for Enforcement
Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Div. v. N.L.R.B
722 F.2d 1120 (3d Cir. 1983) Cited 17 timesIn Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Division v. NLRB, 722 F.2d 1120 (3d Cir. 1983), the court rejected an argument that an "extracontractual residual rights" theory allowed imposition of attendance rules.
Int'l Broth. of Elec. Workers v. N.L.R.B
795 F.2d 150 (D.C. Cir. 1986) Cited 14 timesHolding that a zipper clause similar in language to TCI and to the zipper clause in the present case was a waiver of past practice allowing the employer to unilaterally discontinue a forty-year past practice of Christmas bonuses
N.L.R.B. v. Miller Brewing Company
408 F.2d 12 (9th Cir. 1969) Cited 17 timesNo. 22698. February 20, 1969. John D. Burgoyne (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David C. Nevins, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Cassady, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Willard Z. Carr, Jr. (argued) of Gibson, Dunn Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON, District Judge. Hon. Harry Pregerson, United States District Judge, Los Angeles
Section 151 - Definitions; short title
45 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 2,961 times 7 Legal AnalysesDefining "minor dispute" as disputes "growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements covering rates of pay, rules, or working conditions."