Jesse J. Thaler

20 Cited authorities

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 164 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Listing thirteen factors relevant to likelihood of confusion determination
  2. Palm Bay Imp. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin

    396 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 53 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding similarity between VEUVE ROYALE and two VEUVE CLICQUOT marks in part because VEUVE "remains a ‘prominent feature’ as the first word in the mark and the first word to appear on the label"
  3. Herbko Intern., Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc.

    308 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 41 times
    Explaining that proprietary rights are necessary to show priority of use when petitioning for cancellation under section 2(d)
  4. Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Group

    637 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2011)   Cited 20 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that substantial evidence may support a decision "even if two inconsistent conclusions can be drawn from the evidence"
  5. In re Nat. Data Corp.

    753 F.2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that a "likelihood of confusion cannot be predicated on dissection of a mark"
  6. In re Viterra Inc.

    671 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 18 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "any minor differences in the sound of [X–Seed and XCEED marks for agricultural seeds] may go undetected by consumers and, therefore, would not be sufficient to distinguish the marks"
  7. Stone Lion Capital Partners, L.P. v. Lion Capital LLP

    746 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2014)   Cited 13 times
    Reviewing the weight given to the similarity-of-the-marks factor for legal error
  8. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc.

    281 F.3d 1261 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that a registration for “electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals” is “closely related” to a registration “covering facsimile machines, computers, and computer software”
  9. In re I.Am.Symbolic, LLC

    866 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2017)   Cited 9 times
    Finding that the similarity of the marks weighed heavily in favor of a likelihood of confusion
  10. In re Dixie Restaurants, Inc.

    105 F.3d 1405 (Fed. Cir. 1997)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that DELTA is the dominant portion of the mark THE DELTA CAFÉ where the disclaimed word CAFÉ is descriptive of applicant's restaurant services
  11. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,275 times   80 Legal Analyses
    Requiring for use-based registration "such number of specimens or facsimiles of the mark as used as may be required by the Director"
  12. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,442 times   205 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"