§

Jamestown Machine and Manufacturing Co.

127 N.L.R.B. 172 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Jamestown Machine and Manufacturing Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  2. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  3. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Laister-Kauffmann A.

    144 F.2d 9 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 15 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Laister-Kauffmann Aircraft Corp., 8 Cir., 144 F.2d 9, and Allen-Morrison Sign Co., 79 N.L.R.B. 904, some indicia of actual supervisory authority were present as well as elements of estoppel.

  5. Wyman-Gordon Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    153 F.2d 480 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8872. February 9, 1946. Petition for Modification Denied March 18, 1946. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Wyman-Gordon Company, Ingalls Shepard Division, to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Board requested enforcement of its order. Order set aside in part and enforced in part. George B. Christensen, Frank B. Gilmer, and Edward J. Wendrow, all of Chicago, Ill., (Winston, Strawn Shaw, of Chicago

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Pearl Button

    149 F.2d 311 (8th Cir. 1945)   Cited 7 times

    No. 12971. May 8, 1945. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of order finding the American Pearl Button Company and another guilty of unfair labor practices. Order enforced in part and cause remanded for modification. Stephen M. Reynolds, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Minneapolis, Minn. (Alvin J. Rockwell, Gen. Counsel, Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Winthrop A. Johns