§

Jackson Manufacturing Co.

129 N.L.R.B. 460 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Jackson Manufacturing Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  2. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  3. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  4. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

    284 U.S. 370 (1932)   Cited 254 times
    Holding invalid Interstate Commerce Commission's retroactive application of new rate

  5. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  7. National Labor R.B. v. Wooster Div., Borg-W

    236 F.2d 898 (6th Cir. 1956)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 12687, 12730. September 12, 1956. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Irving M. Herman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for N.L.R.B. James C. Davis, Cleveland, Ohio, for Wooster Division, of Borg-Warner Corp. Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D.C. (Harold Cranefield, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for International Union, etc. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. MILLER, Circuit Judge. These cases are before the

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mayer

    196 F.2d 286 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 21 times
    Ruling that employees have the right to designate a collective bargaining representative as well as the right to revoke such designation

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Ingram

    273 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 12 times

    No. 17799. January 13, 1960. Margaret M. Farmer, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Mark L. Taliaferro, C.V. Stelzenmuller, Birmingham, Ala., Finis E. St. John, Cullman, Ala., St. John St. John, Cullman, Ala., Burr, McKamy, Moore Thomas, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for respondent. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and CAMERON, Circuit

  10. Poole Foundry Mach. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Poole the court upheld the Board's bargaining order, concluding that the employer's withdrawal of recognition of the union based on a decertification petition signed by sixty-four of sixty-six employees within four months of the employer's settlement agreement with the union violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.