§

JACK IN THE BOX, INC.

364 NLRB No. 12 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
JACK IN THE BOX, INC.

14 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,936 times   602 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"

  2. Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank v. Roper

    445 U.S. 326 (1980)   Cited 1,000 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denial of class certification is appealable after entry of final judgment

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 141 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

  5. Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 66 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA

  6. Patterson v. Raymours Furniture Co.

    96 F. Supp. 3d 71 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)   Cited 53 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that arbitration provision in employee handbook was enforceable agreement to arbitrate and that "[i]t is well-settled that revisions to an employee handbook are binding when the employee continues to work after receiving notice of the revisions"

  7. Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC

    152 F. Supp. 3d 1243 (C.D. Cal. 2016)   Cited 26 times
    Applying California law

  8. Nanavati v. Adecco USA, Inc.

    99 F. Supp. 3d 1072 (N.D. Cal. 2015)   Cited 21 times
    Finding the defendant's burden to establish the existence of a valid agreement satisfied where the defendant offered a detailed, unopposed declaration establishing that plaintiff did electronically sign the agreement, and the plaintiff did not "challenge the authenticity of his signature or the prima facie validity of the arbitration agreement," nor did the plaintiff offer evidence to suggest that he did not sign the agreement

  9. Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 17 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

  10. Enloe Medical Center v. N.L.R.B

    433 F.3d 834 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that contractual provision allowing employer to adopt or change policies during course of agreement permitted employer to unilaterally change on-call policy