§

Ivy Hill Lithograph Co.

121 N.L.R.B. 831 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Ivy Hill Lithograph Co.

20 Cited authorities

  1. Toledo Co. v. Computing Co.

    261 U.S. 399 (1923)   Cited 231 times
    Affirming the district court's award of attorneys' fees incurred to litigate contempt proceedings

  2. Mine Workers v. Arkansas Flooring Co.

    351 U.S. 62 (1956)   Cited 79 times
    In United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 351 U.S. 62, 76 S.Ct. 559, 100 L. Ed. 941, references to postlegislative history were referred to in the opinion of the Court.

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  5. Western Air Lines v. Pub. Uti. Commn

    342 U.S. 908 (1952)   Cited 19 times

    No. 465. January 7, 1952, October TERM, 1951. Appeals from the Supreme Court of California. Per Curiam: The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE BURTON are of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted. Oscar A. Trippet and Paul M. Godehn for appellant in No. 464. Hugh W. Darling for appellant in No. 465. Everett C. McKeage for appellee.

  6. English v. Mattson

    214 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 30 times

    No. 14724. June 30, 1954. Rehearing Denied August 5, 1954. Bernard A. Golding, Houston, Tex., for appellant. Charles M. Haden, Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for appellee. Before STRUM and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge. DAWKINS, District Judge. Appellee, an automobile dealer in Lonoke, Arkansas, on July 31, 1951, sold eight automobiles to one Martin of Houston, Texas. After investigating his financial standing, Mattson, appellee, gave Martin title

  7. National L. Rel. B. v. Sunrise L. Trim

    241 F.2d 620 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 26 times

    No. 115, Docket 24222. Argued January 9, 1957. Decided February 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Samuel M. Singer, Nancy M. Sherman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph T. King, Alexander Eltman, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions

  8. National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Pyne Molding Corp

    226 F.2d 818 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 25 times

    No. 84, Docket 23635. Argued October 5, 1955. Decided October 28, 1955. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Provost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Arnold Ordman and James A. Ryan, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Morgan P. Ames, Stamford, Conn., for respondent. W.H.F. Millar, Waynesville, N.C., of counsel. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. This petition to enforce

  9. Rome Grader M. Corp. v. J.D. Adams Mfg. Co.

    135 F.2d 617 (7th Cir. 1943)   Cited 35 times

    No. 8134. May 17, 1943. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division; Robert C. Baltzell, Judge. Action by Rome Grader Machinery Corporation, against J.D. Adams Manufacturing Company for patent infringement. From a decree for defendant after a finding of laches on part of plaintiff, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Frank M. Slough, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Ralph G. Lockwood, of Indianapolis, Ind., for appellant. James A. Ross and Verne

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clearfield Cheese

    213 F.2d 70 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Clearfield Cheese Co., 213 F.2d 70 (3 Cir. 1954), a Board order to reinstate discharged striking employees was modified to exclude compulsory reinstatement of 21 employees guilty of picket line misconduct.