5 Cited authorities
District No. 9 v. N.L.R.B
315 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1962) Cited 24 timesNo. 16901. Argued September 27, 1962. Decided November 15, 1962. Mr. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations
Construction, Prod. Lab. U. v. N.L.R.B
323 F.2d 422 (9th Cir. 1963) Cited 21 timesNoting that the Supreme Court recognizes a "definite" distinction between an agreement to cease doing business and the cessation itself
N.L.R.B. v. AMALGAMATED LITHOGRAPHERS OF AM
309 F.2d 31 (9th Cir. 1962) Cited 19 timesIn NLRB v. Amalgamated Lithographers of America, 309 F.2d 31, 51 LRRM 2093 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied 372 U.S. 943, 82 S.Ct. 936, 9 L.Ed.2d 968 (1963), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a union committed an unfair labor practice in refusing to bargain in good faith when the union insisted upon the inclusion of an illegal contract provision.
Bakery Wagon Drivers, No. 484 v. N.L.R.B
321 F.2d 353 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 18 timesNo. 17200. Argued March 20, 1963. Decided May 23, 1963. Mr. Duane B. Beeson, San Francisco, Cal., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before DANAHER
N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Un. Operating Engineers
317 F.2d 638 (8th Cir. 1963) Cited 12 timesFinding the building and construction industry is an industry affecting commerce