§

Int'l Brotherhood Electrical Workers, Local 11

153 N.L.R.B. 1173 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Int'l Brotherhood Electrical Workers, Local 11

8 Cited authorities

  1. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Bangor Bldg. Trades Council

    278 F.2d 287 (1st Cir. 1960)   Cited 21 times

    No. 5531. April 18, 1960. Fred S. Landess, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Henry Wise, Boston, Mass., with whom Robert L. Wise and Wise Wise, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondents. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. ALDRICH, Circuit Judge. This

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gluek Brewing Co.

    144 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 26 times
    In Glueck, the court recognized that an independent contractor could not be held liable for an unfair labor practice if it was "an entirely innocent and unconscious instrument" of the perpetrator of the practice, but "[w]here an independent contractor knowingly participates in the effectuation of an unfair practice, it places itself within the orbit of the Board's corrective jurisdiction."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers

    293 F.2d 319 (9th Cir. 1961)   Cited 8 times

    No. 16962. July 20, 1961. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Hans J. Lehmann, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles K. Hackler, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and WALSH, District Judge. WALSH, District Judge. This case is before us upon a petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Local 294

    273 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 6 times

    No. 42, Docket 25558. Argued December 3, 1959. Decided January 12, 1960. Herman M. Levy, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harry Pozefsky, Gloversville, N.Y., for respondents. Before CLARK, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges. MOORE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) petitions

  8. Operating Eng. L. Un. No. 3 v. N.L.R.B

    266 F.2d 905 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 5 times
    In Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 v. NLRB, the Court of Appeals approved the Board's conclusion that a contractor did not violate the Act by complying with a subcontracting clause under which it was not permitted to subcontract engineering work to a firm that did not observe the terms of the union's contract.