21 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal AnalysesAffirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Labor Board v. Reliance Fuel Corp.
371 U.S. 224 (1963) Cited 133 timesIn Reliance Fuel Oil Corp., the Board found that Reliance Fuel Oil Corp. ("Reliance"), a New York corporation engaged in the business of selling fuel oil for heating purposes and servicing oil burners and boilers, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the NLRA because it had "purchased a substantial amount of fuel oil from Gulf, a company concededly engaged in interstate commerce."
Polish Alliance v. Labor Board
322 U.S. 643 (1944) Cited 138 timesIn Polish National Alliance v. NLRB, 322 U.S. 643, 64 S.Ct. 1196, 88 L.Ed. 1509 (1944), the Court held that the National Labor Relations Act applied to a fraternal organization providing death, disability and accident benefits to its members and their beneficiaries.
National Labor Rel. Board v. Baltimore T. Co.
140 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1944) Cited 57 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore T. Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 51, the court alluded with apparent approval to the fact that the Board had endeavored to avoid making its sanctions operate retroactively.
N.L.R.B. v. Cent. Okla. Milk Producers Ass'n
285 F.2d 495 (10th Cir. 1960) Cited 24 times 1 Legal AnalysesGranting enforcement of N.L.R.B. order finding milk tank-truck drivers entitled to overtime under FLSA where drivers were employed by separate trucking entity owned by dairy association
Bon Hennings Logging Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
308 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. 1962) Cited 17 timesNos. 17543, 17599. September 4, 1962. George O. Bahrs, and R.J. Scolnik, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner Bon Hennings Logging Co. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, and Elliott Moore, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent and petitioner N.L.R.B. Clayton Knowles, Arcata, Cal., in pro. per, for respondent Clayton Knowles. Before HAMLIN, JERTBERG and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. HAMLIN,
N.L.R.B. v. Aurora City Lines, Inc.
299 F.2d 229 (7th Cir. 1962) Cited 17 timesNo. 13465. February 2, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A.I. Mendelsohn, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack and H.M. Levy, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Fred M. Petit, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) has petitioned under section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Townsend
185 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1950) Cited 30 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Townsend, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 378, this court found jurisdiction in respect to the activities of a local Hudson automobile dealer where it appeared that while the respondent, operating at Santa Maria, California, purchased all of his new automobiles from the Hudson Sales Corporation at Los Angeles, yet the latter organization shipped all of such automobiles into the State from outside points.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. New Madrid Mfg. Co.
215 F.2d 908 (8th Cir. 1954) Cited 25 timesIn New Madrid the business was transferred to a new employer, which was held liable for the unfair labor practices committed by its predecessor before closing.