§

International Trailer Co., Inc.

150 N.L.R.B. 1205 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
International Trailer Co., Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Co.

    282 U.S. 555 (1931)   Cited 1,111 times
    Holding that although damages must be "the certain result of the wrong," they may be "uncertain in respect of their amount."

  2. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  3. Palmer v. Connecticut Ry. Co.

    311 U.S. 544 (1941)   Cited 110 times
    Construing "actual damages" in the Bankruptcy Act as synonymous with nonspeculative, compensatory damages, and noting that "[t]he ways compensatory damages may be proven are many"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Gibraltar Industries, Inc.

    307 F.2d 428 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 13 times
    Granting enforcement petition based on finding that "there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's conclusion" viewing the "separate legal entities as a single employing enterprise"

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Cashman Auto Co.

    223 F.2d 832 (1st Cir. 1955)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Cashman Auto Co., 223 F.2d 832, 836 (1st Cir. 1955), the First Circuit noted, over half a century ago, that the principle of mitigation of damages does not require success; it only requires an honest good faith effort by the complaining party.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E. Tex. St. Castings

    255 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14459. May 15, 1958. Rehearing Denied June 11, 1958. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Rosanna A. Blake, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.B. Fisher, J.D. McLaughlin, Paris, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In May 1954, we entered a decree modifying and enforcing

  9. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Kartarik, Inc.

    227 F.2d 190 (8th Cir. 1955)   Cited 15 times

    No. 14958. November 22, 1955. Norton J. Come, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and William J. Avrutis, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold Shear, St. Paul, Minn., for respondent. Before JOHNSEN, COLLET and VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judges. JOHNSEN, Circuit

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Spitzer Motor Sales

    211 F.2d 235 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 2 times

    No. 203, Docket 22853. Argued March 10, 1954. Decided March 24, 1954. Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Arthur Kaplan, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA, and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The objections raised to enforcement