§

In the Matter of MacCaud

14 I&N Dec. 429 (B.I.A. 1973)
In the Matter of MacCaud

11 Cited authorities

  1. Kovac v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    407 F.2d 102 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that well-founded fear of persecution was established by "a probability of deliberate imposition of substantial economic disadvantage upon an alien for reasons of race, religion, or political opinion," and remanding denial of asylum where "[i]t became impossible for [a chef] to obtain employment in the occupation for which he was trained"

  2. Peignand v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    440 F.2d 757 (1st Cir. 1971)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that differences in matters of succession distinguished legitimation from acknowledgment in the statute at issue

  3. United States v. Murff

    264 F.2d 926 (2d Cir. 1959)   Cited 23 times
    In United States ex rel. Tom Man v. Murff, 264 F.2d 926 (2d Cir. 1959), this court held that before an alien might be deported, the consent of the receiving country must be procured.

  4. Rosa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    440 F.2d 100 (1st Cir. 1971)   Cited 10 times
    Stating that nongovernmental acts may constitute persecution where the group "has sufficient de facto political power to carry out its purposes without effective hindrance "

  5. MacCaud v. I. N. S

    500 F.2d 355 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 1039, 609, Dockets 73-2421, 72-2336. Argued May 28, 1974. Decided July 3, 1974. Daniel J. Weinstein, Buffalo, N.Y., for petitioner. Lydia E. Morgan, Special Asst. U.S. Atty. (Paul J. Curran, U.S. Atty., for the S. D. N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Norman Mueller, Law Student, New Haven, Conn. (Dennis E. Curtis, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant. Barry J. Cutler, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Stewart H. Jones, U.S. Atty., for the District of Connecticut, on the brief), for defendant-appellee

  6. MacCaud v. United States

    354 F. Supp. 872 (D. Conn. 1972)   Cited 2 times

    Civ. No. B-558. October 5, 1972. Norman D. MacCaud, pro se. Stewart Jones, U.S. Atty., Barry Cutler, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ZAMPANO, District Judge. The petitioner, presently incarcerated in the Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury, Connecticut, has applied for an injunction, enjoining his deportation hearing scheduled for October 6, 1972, and for a writ of mandamus, ordering the Attorney General to perform certain acts pursuant to the provisions

  7. Lu v. Rogers

    164 F. Supp. 320 (D.D.C. 1958)   Cited 12 times
    In Lu v. Rogers, 164 F. Supp. 320, 321 (D.D.C. 1958), aff'd 262 F.2d 471 (D.C. Cir. 1958), the court concluded that 8 U.S.C. § 1253(a) "require[d] a determination that the country to which the alien is to be sent is willing to accept him" and that such determination "must be made prior to the time of the deportation.

  8. Soric v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    346 F.2d 360 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 3 times

    No. 14752. June 3, 1965. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1965. Nathan T. Notkin, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Edward V. Hanrahan, U.S. Atty., John Powers Crowley, John Peter Lulinski, Arthur D. Rissman, Asst. U.S. Attys., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY, KNOCH and KILEY, Circuit Judges. KILEY, Circuit Judge. The Attorney General, through his delegates, denied an application of petitioner Soric, formerly a seaman, whose last citizenship was Yugoslavian, under Sec. 243(h) of the Immigration

  9. United States v. Esperdy

    197 F. Supp. 914 (S.D.N.Y. 1961)   Cited 6 times
    In United States ex rel. Wong Kan Wong v. Esperdy, 197 F. Supp. 914 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), the alien had designated the China mainland as the country to which he wished to be sent in the event that he were ordered deported.

  10. Urtetiqui v. D'Arbel and Others

    34 U.S. 692 (1835)   Cited 22 times

    JANUARY TERM, 1835. Maryland. The plaintiffs instituted a suit in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Maryland, stating themselves to be citizens of the state of Maryland, and that the defendant was an alien, and a subject of the king of Spain. The defendant pleaded in abatement, that one of the plaintiffs, Domingo D'Arbel, was not a citizen of Maryland, nor of any of the United States, but was an alien, and a subject of the king of Spain. Upon the trial of the issue joined

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable