Illinois Central Community Hospital

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees
  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Federbush Co.

    121 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 85 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 121 Fed. 2d 954, decided July 18, 1941, the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was written by Judge Learned Hand.
  5. Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Birdsall Construction Company

    487 F.2d 288 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 5 times

    No. 73-1412. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. November 20, 1973. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., for petitioner. Alan A. Bruckner, Richard I. Manas, Miami, Fla., Allan M. Elster, North Miami Beach, Fla., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Griswold Mfg. Co.

    106 F.2d 713 (3d Cir. 1939)   Cited 27 times

    No. 6831. September 20, 1939. Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board against the Griswold Manufacturing Company. Decree for petitioner. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, and A. Norman Somers, Laurence A. Knapp, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. W. Pitt Gifford and Orson