Hydrologics, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

Teamsters Local v. Lucas Flour Co.
369 U.S. 95 (1962) Cited 1,181 times
Holding that "under the mandate of Lincoln Mills " federal labor law is "paramount" when deciding issues raised under § 301
Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass
404 U.S. 157 (1971) Cited 630 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit
Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board
350 U.S. 270 (1956) Cited 403 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"
SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.
397 U.S. 920 (1970) Cited 200 times 5 Legal Analyses
Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances
Labor Board v. Lion Oil Co.
352 U.S. 282 (1957) Cited 139 times
Observing that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"
Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B
414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 81 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jarm Enterprises, Inc.
785 F.2d 195 (7th Cir. 1986) Cited 24 times
Assessing business operations, plant, workforce, job positions, working conditions, supervisors, machinery, equipment, methods of production, and manufactured product or service to determine successor liability under NLRA
Gary Hobart Water Corporation v. N.L.R.B
511 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1975) Cited 26 times
In Gary Hobart, not only was the contract lacking any acknowledgement of the industrial necessity to avoid work stoppages, but the no-strike clause and the grievance and arbitration procedures of the contract were fundamentally related.
N.L.R.B. v. Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service
782 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1986)
No. 85-1031. Argued November 14, 1985. Decided January 24, 1986. John G. Elligers, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James T. Grady, with whom Gabriel O. Dumont, Jr., Boston, Mass., was on brief, for intervenor. Howard I. Wilgoren, with whom Arthur V. Brown and Lepie, Coven Wilgoren, Framingham, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Petition from The National Labor Relations Board. Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, BOWNES and TORRUELLA, Circuit Judges. BOWNES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations
N.L.R.B. v. SCAM INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
394 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1968) Cited 14 times
No. 16599. May 15, 1968. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Burton L. Raimi, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, for petitioner. George L. Plumb, Chicago, Ill., Peer Pedersen, Chicago, Ill., for respondent; Pedersen Houpt, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Before KNOCH, Senior Circuit Judge, and CASTLE and KILEY, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case

Hydrologics, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

Holding that "under the mandate of Lincoln Mills " federal labor law is "paramount" when deciding issues raised under § 301

Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

Observing that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"

Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

Assessing business operations, plant, workforce, job positions, working conditions, supervisors, machinery, equipment, methods of production, and manufactured product or service to determine successor liability under NLRA

In Gary Hobart, not only was the contract lacking any acknowledgement of the industrial necessity to avoid work stoppages, but the no-strike clause and the grievance and arbitration procedures of the contract were fundamentally related.