Civ. A. No. 52-503. June 5, 1953. Jacob Minkin, New Bedford, Mass., for plaintiff. Francis J. Vaas, A. Lane McGovern and Ropes, Gray, Best, Coolidge Rugg, Boston, Mass., for defendant. WYZANSKI, District Judge. This is a suit under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, commonly called the Taft-Hartley Act, 61 Stat. 156, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185, to order defendant to submit to arbitration the question whether under certain provisions of a collective bargaining contract with plaintiff it is
No. 13654. Argued December 8, 1961. Decided February 14, 1962. Richard H. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Wilderman, Markowitz Kirschner, Paula R. Markowitz, Richard Kirschner, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants. Robert W. Lees, Philadelphia, Pa. (John F.E. Hippel, Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell Hippel, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and GANEY, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. The narrow question on this appeal is whether an employer can bring