§
Honda of Hayward

16 Cited authorities

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 227 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  4. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    711 F.2d 348 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 41 times

    Nos. 82-1418 to 82-1420, 82-1743, 82-1589 and 82-1940. Argued May 5, 1983. Decided June 30, 1983. George H. Cohen, with whom Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for petitioners, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Local Union No. 6-418, AFL-CIO, et al. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Robert K. Carrol, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner, Borden Chemical, A Division of Borden, Inc. Howard A. Crawford, with whom Jack D. Rowe, Kansas City, Mo., was on brief, for petitioner

  5. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Pfizer, Inc.

    763 F.2d 887 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production

  7. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. George Koch Sons, Inc.

    950 F.2d 1324 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 16 times
    Finding that employer "waived the issue of deadlock by failing to present evidence of deadlock before the ALJ"

  9. Mary Thompson Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    943 F.2d 741 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that a union was entitled to a sales and transfer agreement "in order to verify the data it obtained through alternative sources"

  10. Local 13, Detroit Newspaper, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 267 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 24 times
    Clarifying that the good-faith requirement applies both to employer and union

  11. Section 1904.2 - Partial exemption for establishments in certain industries

    29 C.F.R. § 1904.2   Cited 20 times   4 Legal Analyses

    (a)Basic requirement. (1) If your business establishment is classified in a specific industry group listed in appendix A to this subpart, you do not need to keep OSHA injury and illness records unless the government asks you to keep the records under § 1904.41 or § 1904.42 . However, all employers must report to OSHA any workplace incident that results in an employee's fatality, in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye (see § 1904.39 ). (2) If one or more of your company's establishments