Honda of Haslett

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"
  3. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
  4. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
  5. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Company

    398 F.2d 336 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Company, Inc., 398 F.2d 336 (C.A.4), the court held that authorization cards are such unreliable indicators of the desires of the employees that an employer confronted with a demand for recognition based solely upon them is justified in withholding recognition pending the result of a certification election.
  7. N.L.R.B. v. McCormick Concrete Company of S.C

    371 F.2d 149 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 11 times

    No. 10576. Argued November 1, 1966. Decided January 10, 1967. Charles N. Steele, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. Wm. H. Smith, Jr., Columbia, S.C. (Ellison D. Smith, Jr., Columbia, S.C., on brief), for respondent. Before BOREMAN, J. SPENCER BELL and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges. BOREMAN, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations Board (hereafter

  8. Columbian Carbon v. Int'l U

    360 F.2d 1018 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 3 times

    No. 22717. May 17, 1966. James C. Sanders, Culton, Morgan, Britain White, Amarillo, Tex., for appellant. Sam Houston Clinton, Jr., Austin, Tex., for appellee. Before GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and WEST, District Judge. THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: Appellee-Union brought this suit under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. ยง 185, on behalf of certain Company employees to compel arbitration of the question of wages paid temporary construction workers. The district court

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys