§

Honda of America Mfg., Inc.

334 N.L.R.B. 746 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Honda of America Mfg., Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Letter Carriers v. Austin

    418 U.S. 264 (1974)   Cited 609 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union newsletter's description of a “scab” as a “traitor” could not be construed as a factual assertion

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee

    415 U.S. 322 (1974)   Cited 76 times
    In Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.

  3. Dreis Krump Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    544 F.2d 320 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board's refusal to defer on ground that award would violate employee's § 7 rights.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Mead Corp.

    73 F.3d 74 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 12 times

    No. 94-6250. Argued November 27, 1995. Decided January 8, 1996. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Frederick C. Havard (briefed), Christopher Young (argued and briefed), N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Robert Joseph Brown (argued and briefed), Todd D. Penney, Thompson, Hine Flory, Dayton, OH, for Respondent. On Application For Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before: MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges; COHN, District Judge. The Honorable Avern Cohn

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  6. Caterpillar Tractor v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    230 F.2d 357 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 25 times
    Stating that employer can prohibit employees from wearing buttons emblazoned with the slogan "Don't be a Scab" because of slogan's inherent tension to incite unrest and resentment; however, the restriction does not include "passive inoffensive advertisement of organizational aims and interests . . . which in no way interferes with discipline and production"