Holmes Products Corp. v. Honeywell Consumer Products, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Inwood Laboratories v. Ives Laboratories

    456 U.S. 844 (1982)   Cited 1,290 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that secondary liability for trademark infringement arises when a manufacturer or distributor intentionally induces another to infringe
  2. Yamaha Intern. Corp. v. Hoshino Gakki Co.

    840 F.2d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 46 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding secondary meaning for shape of guitar head always appearing in advertising and promotional literature
  3. Application of Abcor Development Corp.

    588 F.2d 811 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 36 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Abcor, the question before the court was whether applicant's alleged mark (GASBADGE) was "merely descriptive" within the meaning of § 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(1).
  4. Edwards v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.

    842 F.2d 1316 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

    No. 86-5238. Argued February 6, 1987. Decided April 1, 1988. Aaron M. Levine, Washington, D.C., for appellant. David F. Grimaldi, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Before MIKVA, EDWARDS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Opinion PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: This is a case about the scope of a particular term in an accidental death insurance policy in the District of Columbia. Appellant's decedent, Donald Edwards, was run over by a bus

  5. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 94,288 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
  6. Rule 612 - Writing Used to Refresh a Witness's Memory

    Fed. R. Evid. 612   Cited 517 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Providing rules for using a writing to refresh a witness's recollection