Hesmer Foods, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
  2. Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board

    316 U.S. 31 (1942)   Cited 160 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

    351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc.

    327 F.2d 421 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 38 times
    Reversing credibility finding where examiner "credited the testimony of a highly prejudiced and interested witness and discredited the testimony of all witnesses to the contrary"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.

    358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 26 times
    In Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.

    349 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 7 times
    In Tanner, supra, two employees were discharged for picketing their employer in protest over its racially discriminatory hiring practices.
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shedd-Brown MFG

    213 F.2d 163 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 14 times

    No. 11031. May 17, 1954. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 17, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Clarence A. Meter, Arnold Ordman, Duane Beeson, and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Donald O. Wright, Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant

    207 F.2d 165 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 9 times

    No. 12985. September 15, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Morris A. Solomon, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Raymond S. Smathurst, Washington, D.C., J.P. Stirling, Roscoe Watts, John T. Casey, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before HEALY, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, requests enforcement

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bachelder

    120 F.2d 574 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 20 times

    No. 7514. March 13, 1941. Rehearing Denied April 14, 1941. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against W.C. Bachelder, receiver for the Hoosier Veneer Company. Order modified, and enforcement of the order, as modified, granted. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harold K. Bachelder, of Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before EVANS and KERNER

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Kalof Pulp Paper Corporation

    290 F.2d 447 (9th Cir. 1961)   Cited 1 times

    No. 16903. April 3, 1961. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Max Bernbaum, Beverly Hills, Cal., and Gordon B. Severance, Monterey Park, Cal., for respondent Company. Warren Woods and Wilson, Woods Villalon, Washington, D.C., for respondent unions. Before BARNES, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. This case is before us