§

Harvey Aluminum, Inc.

139 N.L.R.B. 151 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Harvey Aluminum, Inc.

39 Cited authorities

  1. Mapp v. Ohio

    367 U.S. 643 (1961)   Cited 8,419 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the exclusionary rule under the Fourth Amendment applies to the States, and overruling the contrary rule of Wolf v. Colorado , 338 U.S. 25, 69 S.Ct. 1359, 93 L.Ed. 1782, after considering and rejecting "the current validity of the factual grounds upon which Wolf was based"

  2. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,306 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  3. Jencks v. United States

    353 U.S. 657 (1957)   Cited 1,103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants are entitled to obtain the prior statements of persons to government agents when those persons are to testify against the defendants at trial

  4. Palermo v. United States

    360 U.S. 343 (1959)   Cited 655 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "summaries of an oral statement which evidence substantial selection of material . . . are not to be produced" under the Jencks Act

  5. Olmstead v. United States

    277 U.S. 438 (1928)   Cited 1,578 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a wiretap was not a search because “[t]here was no entry of the houses or offices of the defendants”

  6. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  7. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  8. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.

    306 U.S. 240 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.

  9. United States v. Annunziato

    293 F.2d 373 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 116 times
    In United States v. Annunziato, 293 F.2d 373 (2nd Cir. 1961), a case remarkably similar to the present one, the declarations of a deceased co-conspirator were admitted into evidence.

  10. Labor Board v. Clothing Co.

    301 U.S. 58 (1937)   Cited 61 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 422 and 423. Argued February 11, 1937. Decided April 12, 1937. The National Labor Relations Act, and orders made under it by the National Labor Relations Board, sustained upon the authority of National Labor Relations Board v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corp., ante, p. 1, as applied to a manufacturer of garments, having its factory in Virginia but which imported its cloth from other States and sold almost all of the finished products

  11. Section 3500 - Demands for production of statements and reports of witnesses

    18 U.S.C. § 3500   Cited 5,462 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Requiring the government to produce "any statement," including testimony provided before the grand jury, only after the witness has testified on direct examination at trial

  12. Section 35 - Imparting or conveying false information

    18 U.S.C. § 35   Cited 72 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Imposing a monetary "civil penalty" upon "[w]hoever imparts or conveys or causes to be imparted or conveyed false information, knowing the information to be false, concerning an attempted or alleged attempt being made or to be made, to do any act which would be a crime prohibited by this chapter [i.e., Chapter 2, Aircraft and Motor Vehicles] or chapter 97 [i.e., Railroad Carriers and Mass Transportation Systems on Land, on Water, or Through the Air] or chapter 111 [i.e., Shipping] of this title [i.e., Title 18]"