§

Ground Zero Foundation d/b/a Academy for Creative Enrichment

04-CA-245956 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 25, 2020)
Ground Zero Foundation d/b/a Academy for Creative Enrichment

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  6. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Deauville Hotel

    751 F.2d 1562 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 17 times

    No. 83-5383. February 8, 1985. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Perlstein, Ellen A. Farrell, L. Pat Wynns, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joel I. Keiler, McLean, Va., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before TJOFLAT and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges, and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge. TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: The principal question presented in this appeal is whether, and, if so, for what period of time, the

  8. Section 708 - Special employment practices relating to health care and child care facilities

    Del. Code tit. 19 § 708   Cited 1 times

    (a) Definitions. -- (1) "Child care facility" means any child care facility which is required to be licensed by the Department of Education, Office of Child Care Licensing. (2) "Direct access" means the opportunity to have personal contact with persons receiving care during the course of one's assigned duties. (3) "Health care facility" means any custodial or residential facility where health, nutritional or personal care is provided for persons, including long term care facilities as defined in