Gladstone'S 4 Fish

9 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Labor Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp.

    368 U.S. 318 (1961)   Cited 90 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp., 368 U.S. 318, 322, 82 S.Ct. 344, 7 L.Ed.2d 312 (1961), the Court considered the appellate court's power to modify Board orders when entering a consent judgment under § 160(e).
  3. Airport Parking Management v. N.L.R.B

    720 F.2d 610 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that when a finding of impermissible motivation in hiring has been made, an employer may defend the hiring by showing that, even absent the illegal motivation, it would not have hired the predecessor's employees.
  4. Schaefer v. N.L.R.B

    697 F.2d 558 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 6 times

    No. 82-3201. Argued January 6, 1983. Decided January 19, 1983. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied March 11, 1983. James B. Hecht (argued), Richard V. Sica, Thorp, Reed Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner. Vivian A. Miller, Mendelssohn V. McLean (argued), William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy-Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the

  5. National Book Consolidators, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    672 F.2d 323 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 81-1588, 81-2295. Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit Rule 12(6) November 30, 1981. Decided February 23, 1982. Stephen A. Ploscowe, Theodore M. Eisenberg, Jerold E. Glassman, Grotta, Glassman Hoffman, P.A., Roseland, N. J., for petitioner National Book Consolidators, Inc. John D. Burgoyne, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael G. Okun, William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L

  6. Lodge 743, In. Ass'n of Mach. v. United Aircraft

    337 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 21 times

    No. 384, Docket 28595. Argued May 26, 1964. Decided October 1, 1964. Mozart G. Ratner, Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., William S. Zeman, Hartford, Conn., for appellees. Joseph C. Wells, Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C. (Reilly Wells, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Solomon I. Hirsh, Glen M. Bendixsen, Attys., N.L.R.B., for intervenor. Before LUMBARD

  7. U.S. Contractors, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    697 F.2d 692 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 81-4394, 81-4414. February 7, 1983. James M. Neel, Houston, Tex., for U.S. Contractors, Inc. James P. Simpson, Texas City, Tex., for Intern. Union of Operating Engineers, etc. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, David S. Fishback, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Richard R. Brann and Joseph R. Weeks, Houston, Tex., for Dow Chemical Co. Petitions for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Campbell Soup Company

    378 F.2d 259 (9th Cir. 1967)   Cited 8 times

    No. 21297. May 23, 1967. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, H.M. Levy, Marsha Swiss, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Charles P. Scully, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Butchers Union Local 127. Douglas H. Springer, W.L. White, Jr., Camden, N.J., Gilford G. Rowland, Rowland, Paras Clowdus, Sacramento, Cal., for appellee Campbell

  9. Section 554 - Adjudications

    5 U.S.C. § 554   Cited 1,043 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to agencies to "issue a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or remove uncertainty."