Gateway Concrete Forming Services, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.
465 U.S. 822 (1984) Cited 206 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection
N.L.R.B. v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.
307 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 52 times
In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.
Helena Laboratories Corp. v. N.L.R.B
557 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir. 1977) Cited 20 times
No. 76-3077. August 22, 1977. George E. Duncan, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioner-cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen., Counsel, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin, Atty., Alan Banov, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent-cross petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas Case). Before THORNBERRY, AINSWORTH and RONEY, Circuit Judges. AINSWORTH, Circuit
Jim Causley Pontiac, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
675 F.2d 125 (6th Cir. 1982) Cited 5 times
Stating that "[t]he Board cannot predicate liability on a negligence standard since the purpose of the Act is to protect concerted activity not punish employer ignorance"

Gateway Concrete Forming Services, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

N.L.R.B. v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.

In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.

Helena Laboratories Corp. v. N.L.R.B

Jim Causley Pontiac, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

Stating that "[t]he Board cannot predicate liability on a negligence standard since the purpose of the Act is to protect concerted activity not punish employer ignorance"