Gastonia Weaving Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Oct 10, 1950

91 N.L.R.B. 899 (N.L.R.B. 1950)

In the Matter of GASTONIA WEAVING COMPANY, EMPLOYER and UNITED
TEXTILE WORKERS OP AMERICA,1 PETITIONER
Case No. JIf-RC--01.-=Decided October 10, 1950
DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION
Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National
Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before Miles J. McCormick,
hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are
free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board
has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member,
panel [Members Houston, Reynolds, and Styles].
Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds :
1. The Employer, a North Carolina corporation, is engaged at its
Gastonia, North Carolina, plant, in the manufacture of textile prod-
ucts, particularly woven labels. During the past 12 months, the
Employer purchased raw materials valued in excess of $50,000, of
which more than 50 percent was received from points outside the
State of North Carolina. During the same period, the Employer
produced finished products valued in excess of $75,000, of which more
than 50 percent was sold and shipped to points outside the State. We
find that the Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning
of the Act. As the Employer manufactures products destined for
out-of-State shipment which have a value of more than $25,000 a
year, we further find that it will effectuate the policies of the Act to
assert jurisdiction in this case.2
2. The labor organization involved claims to represent certain
employees of the Employer.
3. A question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa-
tion of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9
(c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
I On his own motion the hearing officer amended the caption of this case to include Local
No. 2640 of the Petitioner. As there is no indication in the record that the Petitioner
desires this local to appear on the ballot we see no justification for this amendment. If,
however, the Petitioner does in fact desire that Local No. 2640 appear on the ballot in the
election hereinafter directed , it may so request the Regional Director who shall place said
local on the ballot.
2 Stanislaue Implement and„Hardware Company , Ltd., 91 NLRB 618.
91 NLRB No. 136.
917572-51-vol. 91-58 899
900 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
4. The parties agree generally that the appropriate unit consists of
all production and maintenance employees of the Employer, excluding
office clerical employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the
Act. A dispute exists, however, as to the unit placement of the
following employees whom in each case the Employer would include
and the Petitioner would exclude :
Martha Thornberg and Helen Oates: The record shows that these
employees work in the office along with the Employer's other office
employees, where they compile production records for the payroll
department. Virtually all of their time is spent working in the office,
although they are required to . go into the plant each day for brief
periods, varying between 15 and 45 minutes, to obtain certain produc-
tion figures. They have the same office hours as office employees, do
not perform any production work, and are paid on a salary basis as
distinguished from production workers who are paid on a piecework
or time basis. Upon these facts we conclude that these employees
are essentially office clericals. In accordance with our usual policy
we shall exclude them from the production and maintenance unit.
Lead men: The Petitioner would exclude from the unit the machine
shop lead man, the leading yarn man, and the leading examiner, on the
ground that they are supervisors 3
The machine shop lead man works in the machine shop where he
does electrical work and operates a lathe. His hourly rate of pay is
higher than those of the other machine shop employees. Although
there is some evidence tending to show that he is referred to by other
employees as "shop foreman," the record indicates that he has no
authority to hire, discharge, or discipline employees, or effectively to
recommend such action. The record establishes that to the extent
that he directs the work of other employees in the machine shop such
direction does not require the use of independent judgment but consists
essentially of transmitting instructions which he receives from the
foreman or superintendent.
The leading yarn man is employed in the yarn department. His
duties consist of receiving and unpacking yarn coming into the plant,
carrying yarn from the winding room to the quiller room, weighing
waste yarn, keeping certain records, and alloting yarn to the winders.
The record shows that he has no authority to hire, discharge, or dis-
cipline employees, or effectively to recommend such action, and al-
though he gives orders to other employees, it appears that he, like the
machine shop lead man, merely passes along instructions which he has
received from the foreman.
3 The employees in question are Harwell , Edmunds, and Stradley , respectively.
GASTONIA WEAVING COMPANY 901
. The leading examiner works in the examining room along with ap-
proximately 22 other examiners . Approximately 35 percent of her
time is spent performing the same type of work as the examiners are,
and the remainder of her time is devoted to various other jobs such as
observing the work of the examiners, keeping certain records, separat-
ing labels, working on the rolling machine, and at times sewing labels.
She has no authority to hire, discharge, or discipline employees, or
effectively to recommend such action, although, on, occasion, she may
make decisions .on minor personnel matters in the department. To
the extent that she assigns work to other examiners, it appears that she
also'does no more than relay instructions given to her by the foreman.
Upon the basis of the foregoing facts, and upon the entire record
in the case, we believe that the machine shop lead man, the leading
yarn man, and the leading examiner, are not supervisors within the
meaning of the Act. Accordingly, we shall include them in the unit.
Shipping clerk: The shipping clerk works in a small office located
near the main office. His duties consist of wrapping and packaging
labels for shipment by parcel post, typing up shipping tags, taking
packages to the post office, and maintaining an inventory of the vari-
ous kinds of labels kept in stock. To the extent that his duties are
clerical in nature they are ' fundamentally plant, rather than office,
clerical duties. We shall, therefore, include him in the unit.4
Watchmen: The Employer employs two watchmen. They are
neither uniformed nor deputized,'and generally are not armed. The
record establishes that they devote approximately 60 percent of their
time to cleaning, firing stokers, and operating a card-cutting machine,
and generally act as watchmen on week ends. As they do not spend at
least 50 percent of their time as watchmen, we find that they are not
guards within the meaning of the Act, and shall include them in the
unit.-,
We find that all production and maintenance employees at the Em-
ployer's Gastonia, North Carolina, plant, including the shipping
clerk, machine shop lead man, leading yarn man, leading examiner,
and watchmen, but excluding office clericals," guards, and all super-
visors as defined in the Act, constitute a unit appropriate for the pur-
poses of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b)
of the Act.
[Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication in this
volume.]
The Schauer Machine Company, 82 NLRB 490.
s United States Gypsum Company , 81 NLRB 344.
Included in this category are employees Thornberg and Oates.