17 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.
373 U.S. 221 (1963) Cited 358 times 1 Legal AnalysesUpholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Labor Board v. Burnup Sims
379 U.S. 21 (1964) Cited 106 times 21 Legal AnalysesFinding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works
204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953) Cited 57 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.
United Fireworks Mfg. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
252 F.2d 428 (6th Cir. 1958) Cited 35 timesNo. 13343. March 5, 1958. Lloyd H. O'Hara, Dayton, Ohio (Curtner, Brenton O'Hara, Dayton, Ohio, Frederick W. Howell, Dayton, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. Robert E. Manuel, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevot, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attys., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. SHACKELFORD MILLER, JR., Circuit Judge. This case is before
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kobritz
193 F.2d 8 (1st Cir. 1951) Cited 43 timesUpholding an NLRB departure from a policy of declining to assert jurisdiction, on the ground that "the Board had jurisdiction all the time"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sunshine Mining Co.
110 F.2d 780 (9th Cir. 1940) Cited 54 timesNo. 9162. April 3, 1940. Rehearing Granted, Decree Confirmed June 19, 1940. Petition to Enforce An Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition filed by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce an order issued by it in proceedings instituted by the board against the Sunshine Mining Company. Judgment enforcing the order as modified. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp and Malcolm F. Halliday, Asst. Gen. Counsels, and Leonard Appel, Atty., all of National Labor
Local No. 152 v. N.L.R.B
343 F.2d 307 (D.C. Cir. 1965) Cited 13 timesIn Local No. 152 there was evidence (1) that the union honestly but mistakenly believed it represented a majority of the employees in the unit when it sought recognition, and one week thereafter actually attained majority status, (2) the company responded that it was not interested in talking to the union, (3) the company did not in any manner dispute the union's claim of majority representation, (4) the company ignored the union's demand for recognition, and (5) the union petitioned the Board for an election.
West Penn Power Company v. N.L.R.B
337 F.2d 993 (3d Cir. 1964) Cited 12 timesInvolving power transmission and distribution supervisors that prioritized repairs and de-energized lines for repair