Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

Labor Board v. Lion Oil Co.

Observing that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"

Procter Gamble Ind. U. v. Procter Gamble

Concluding that an agreement providing that arbitration may be called for "by either party hereto, the Employer and the Union . . . clearly indicates that only the union or the employer can demand arbitration"

National L.R.B. v. Giustina Bros. L

In NLRB v. Giustina Bros. Lumber Co., 253 F.2d 371 (9th Cir. 1958), we held that Rule 102.46(b) prohibited the respondent from raising an issue before the Ninth Circuit where respondent's objection had been "so ambiguous as to be totally ineffective" in "adequately appris[ing]" the Board of the excepting party's intentions.

Local Un. 219, Retail Clerks Int. v. N.L.R.B