Fluor Daniel, Inc.
3 Cited authorities
Fluor Daniel, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
332 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2003) Cited 15 timesIn Fluor Daniel, the Board apparently calculated the number of deviations from the hiring policy at issue by counting the number of deviations from all hiring protocols for each applicant.
Great Lakes Chemical Corp. v. N.L.R.B
967 F.2d 624 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Cited 14 timesRejecting the same argument because "the more reasonable inference is that the [e]mployer's discriminatory design ultimately failed, not that it wasn't tried"
Tualatin Elect. v. National Lab. Relations Bd.
84 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 1 timesNos. 93-70775, 93-70843 Submitted March 4, 1996 — Portland, Oregon The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4. Filed May 29, 1996 Thomas M. Triplett, Schwabe, Williamson Wyatt, Portland, Oregon, for the petitioner, cross-respondent. David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the respondent