§

Flatbush Manor Care Center

315 N.L.R.B. 15 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Flatbush Manor Care Center

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  5. E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co. v. N.L.R.B

    744 F.2d 536 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 82-1767, 82-1903. Argued April 3, 1984. Decided September 26, 1984. Alan G. Burton, argued, E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co., Legal Dept., Wilmington, Del., George E. Yund, Frost Jacobs, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, L. Pay Wynns, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON, District Judge. The Honorable Benjamin F. Gibson, United

  6. Federal Compress Warehouse Co. v. N.L.R.B

    398 F.2d 631 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 15 times

    No. 18061. August 8, 1968. Edward R. Young, Memphis, Tenn. (Newell N. Fowler, Fowler, Brackhahn Young, Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for petitioner; Leslie A. Nicholson, Nicholson Moore, Memphis, Tenn., of counsel. Joseph A. Yablonski, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co.

    187 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 34 times

    No. 107, Docket 21789. Argued February 7, 1951. Decided March 28, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Raymond M. Norton, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton Devans, Rochester, N.Y., for respondent; Arthur L. Stern and William H. Morris, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK,

  8. N.L.R.B. v. C C Plywood Corp.

    351 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times
    In C C Plywood the Supreme Court said that the disputed contract provision, in dealing with increases for "particular employee[s]", did not authorize a unilateral increase for a group of employees which would invalidate previously negotiated wage differentials.