§

First Student, Inc.

359 N.L.R.B. 1090 (N.L.R.B. 2013)
First Student, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Precision Indoor Comfort Inc.

    456 F.3d 636 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 2 times

    No. 05-1783. Argued: June 9, 2006. Decided and Filed: August 2, 2006. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: Gary W. Spring, Roetzel Andress, Akron, Ohio, for Respondent. Colleen M. Leyrer, National Labor Relations Board, Washington. D.C., for Petitioner. ON BRIEF: Gary W. Spring, Roetzel Andress, Akron, Ohio, for Respondent. Colleen M. Leyrer, Aileen A. Armstrong, Fred B. Jacob, National Labor Relations Board, Washington. D.C. for Petitioner. Before: MOORE, COLE, and CLAY, Circuit

  2. Enterprises v. N.L.R.B

    257 F. App'x 642 (4th Cir. 2007)

    Nos. 06-1881, 06-1917. Argued September 25, 2007. Decided December 7, 2007. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (9-CA-40915; 9-CA41191; 9-CA-41291; 9-CA-41338). ARGUED: Grant T. Pecor, Nantz, Litowich, Smith, Girard Hamilton, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for SNE Enterprises, Inc. David A. Seid, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. ON BRIEF: Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy

  3. Colquest Energy, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    965 F.2d 116 (6th Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that the closeness of the election is an important consideration in determining whether the misconduct has a material impact on the fairness of the representation election

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Otis Hospital

    545 F.2d 252 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times
    Withholding promised wage increase from all employees during union organizing campaign violated § 8

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second