§
Exemplar, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

  2. Labor Board v. Metropolitan Ins. Co.

    380 U.S. 438 (1965)   Cited 180 times
    In Metropolitan Ins. Co., supra, at 444, we made it clear that "`courts may not accept appellate counsel's post hoc rationalizations for agency action.'"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Action Automotive, Inc.

    469 U.S. 490 (1985)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board rule excluding from bargaining unit employees who are relatives of management

  4. Hendry Corp. v. United States Fidelity

    393 U.S. 978 (1968)   Cited 63 times

    No. 537. December 9, 1968, OCTOBER TERM, 1968. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Stanley W. Rosenkranz and Charles W. Pittman for petitioner. E. Dixie Beggs for respondent. Reported below: 391 F. 2d 13.

  5. Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    727 F.3d 552 (6th Cir. 2013)   Cited 16 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Enforcing the original Specialty Healthcare case

  6. Pacific Southwest Airlines v. N.L.R.B

    587 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 31 times
    In Pacific Southwest Airlines, we discussed extensively the considerations relevant in determining whether employees are plant clericals or office clericals.

  7. CGLM Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    280 F. App'x 366 (5th Cir. 2008)

    No. 07-60685. June 3, 2008. Donald C. Douglas, Jr., Middleberg, Riddle Gianna, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. James G. Paulsen, National Labor Relations Board, Region 15, New Orleans, LA, Linda Jill Dreeben, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (15-CA-17889). Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:[fn*]

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Carson Cable TV

    795 F.2d 879 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 13 times
    Holding “day-to-day control of labor relations” by local managers insufficient to defeat finding a single employer

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Lake Co. Assn

    128 F.3d 1181 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1 times

    No. 96-3535 ARGUED MAY 15, 1997 DECIDED NOVEMBER 13, 1997 Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board Region 13, Chicago, IL, Aileen A. Armstrong, Margaret Gaines Neigus, National Labor Relations Board Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Jeffrey Lawrence Horowitz (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Michael A. Luvisi (argued), Donna King Perry, Woodward, Hobson Fulton, Louisville, KY, for Respondent. On Application for Enforcement of

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Western and Southern Life Ins. Co.

    391 F.2d 119 (3d Cir. 1968)   Cited 26 times

    No. 16621. Argued October 3, 1967. Decided March 4, 1968. Warren M. Davison, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda Sher, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. John G. Wayman, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa. (W.D. Armour, Pittsburgh, Pa., Ithamar D. Weed, Cincinatti, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and MARIS and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges