§
Ex Parte Neogi

7 Cited authorities

  1. In re Robinson

    17 B.R. 3 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1982)

    17 B.R. 3 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Ark. 1982) In re Tommy ROBINSON and Marilyn Robinson, Debtors. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Tommy ROBINSON and Marilyn Robinson and A. L. Tenney, Trustee, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. LR 81-276, LR 81-1154. Adv. No. 81-822. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. January 7, 1982 Randolph B. Hopkins, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiff. Jimmy Eaton, Little Rock, Ark., for defendants. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINAL JUDGMENT

  2. Section 103 - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter

    35 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 6,130 times   479 Legal Analyses
    Holding the party seeking invalidity must prove "the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."

  3. Section 102 - Gifts and inheritances

    26 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 366 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Excluding gifts from the gross income of donees

  4. Section 6 - Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 6   Cited 186 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Giving the Director authority to designate "at least 3 members of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board" to review "[e]ach appeal, derivation proceeding, post-grant review, and inter partes review"

  5. Section 134 - Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 134   Cited 98 times   30 Legal Analyses

    (a) PATENT APPLICANT.-An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. (b) PATENT OWNER.-A patent owner in a reexamination may appeal from the final rejection of any claim by the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. 35 U.S.C. § 134 July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 98-622

  6. Section 102 - Repealed

    2 U.S.C. § 102

    2 U.S.C. § 102 Pub. L. 104-186, title II, §204(52), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1737 Section, R.S. §§60, 61; Pub. L. 86-628, §105(c), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 461, required submission by Secretary of Senate and Clerk of House to two Houses of statements as to persons employed and as to expenditures and balances on hand and providing for printing of such reports as Senate and House documents. See sections 4108 and 5535 of this title.

  7. Section 1.136 - Extensions of time

    37 C.F.R. § 1.136   Cited 17 times   30 Legal Analyses

    (a) (1) If an applicant is required to reply within a nonstatutory or shortened statutory time period, applicant may extend the time period for reply up to the earlier of the expiration of any maximum period set by statute or five months after the time period set for reply, if a petition for an extension of time and the fee set in § 1.17(a) are filed, unless: (i) Applicant is notified otherwise in an Office action; (ii) The reply is a reply brief submitted pursuant to § 41.41 of this title; (iii)