§

Elmendorf & Fort Richardson Barber Concessions

247 N.L.R.B. 667 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Elmendorf & Fort Richardson Barber Concessions

10 Cited authorities

  1. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 220 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Labor Board v. Steelworkers

    357 U.S. 357 (1958)   Cited 72 times
    In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."

  4. Custom Recovery, Div. of Keystone v. N.L.R.B

    597 F.2d 1041 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 8 times
    Rejecting an ALJ's finding of inconsistent testimony when "the record reveals that [the witness] was testifying in different contexts"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Daylin, Inc., Discount Division

    496 F.2d 484 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 9 times
    In Daylin, the retail store's no-solicitation rule prohibited all solicitation on its premises during "paid working hours.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Miller

    341 F.2d 870 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 274, 306, Dockets 29186, 29296. Argued January 6, 1965. Decided March 1, 1965. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City (Michael P. Graff, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board

  7. Montgomery Ward Co. v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 889 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 14 times
    In Montgomery Ward, for instance, the court modified an order that applied to all the company's plants because there was "no evidence presented... of any national pattern of unfair labor practices."

  8. Carter Carburetor Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    140 F.2d 714 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 30 times

    No. 12636. February 21, 1944. On Petition to Review and on Request for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings on petition of Carter Carburetor Corporation against the National Labor Relations Board to review an order of the board requiring petitioner to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and, on request of board, for enforcement of order. Petition denied and order enforced. William R. Gentry, of St. Louis, Mo. (N.A. Stancliffe and John L. Farrell, both

  9. May Department Stores Company v. N.L.R.B

    316 F.2d 797 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times

    No. 14940. May 9, 1963. Edward J. Simerka and Eugene B. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, (W.K. Stanley, Stanley, Smoyer Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas E. Shroyer, Washington, D.C., on the brief for American Retail Federation as Amicus Curiae. Stephen B. Goldberg, Washington, D.C., (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras, Stephen B. Goldberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C.,

  10. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,303 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees the right to engage in or refrain from engaging in union activity