Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co., Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsOct 3, 194244 N.L.R.B. 783 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter of ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANER COMPANY, INC. and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF FIREMEN AND OILERS, LOCAL UNION No. 52 (A. F. OF L.) - In the Matter of ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANER COMPANY, INC. and FEDERAL LABOR UNION No. 18907 (A. F. OF L.) In the Matter of ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANER COMPANY, INC. and METAL POLISHERS, BUFFERS, PLATERS AND HELPERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL No. 3 (A. F. OF L.) In the Matter of ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANER COMPANY, INC. and INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, DISTRICT, 54 (A. F.' OF L. ) Cases Nos. R-4214 to R-4217 inclusive respectively.Decided October 3, 1942 Jurisdiction : vacuum cleaner manufacturing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: re- fusal to accord recognition to any of petitioning organizations until certified by the Board; immediate elections directed notwithstanding contention that effects of Company's 'past unfair labor practices had not been dissipated ; elections necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : single or separate units compris- ing, respectively, (1) firemen; (2) polishers, buffers, platers, and welders; machinists, tool and.die makers, millwrights, and diesetters,; ('4) remaining employees; determination of, dependent upon results of separate elections. Mr. Richard C. Swander, for the Board. " • Messrs. Spieth, Taggart, Spring ct3 Annat, ' by 7Mr; Lawrence C. Spieth, of Cleveland, Ohio, for the Company. I 't 11 s • Messrs.,Keeley, Kutash & Bloch, by •Mllr. George G.-Keeley and Mr. Richard K. Bloch, of Cleveland, Ohio, for the.petitioningunions. Mr. Henry Fiering, of Cleveland, Ohio, for the United. Mr. Eugene R. Thorrens, of counsel 'to' the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon separate petitions duly filed by International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Local Union No. 52 (A. F. of L.)-, herein called the 44 N L R B., No. 150. 783 784 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Firemen; Federal Labor Union No. 18907 (A. F. of L.), herein called the Federal; 'Metal Polishers,' Buffers, Platers and Helpers Interna- tional Union, Local No. No. 3 (A. F. of L.), herein called the Metal Polishers; and International Association of Machinists, District 54 (A. F. of L.), herein called the Machinists,' each alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Electric Vacuum Cleaner Company, Inc., East Cleve- land, Ohio, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before William P. Webb, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Cleve- land, Ohio, on August 27, 1942. The Company, the Firemen, the Federal, the Metal Polishers, the Machinists, and United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America (C. I. 0.), herein called the United, appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine, witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing upon the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. The petitioning unions and the United filed briefs which the Board has considered. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE I3USINESS OF THE COMPANY 'Electric Vacuum Cleaner Company, Inc.; a New York corporation with its principal office and plant at East Cleveland, Ohio, manu-- factures, sells, and distributes vacuum cleaners, parts, and accessories. During 1941 about 75 percent of the raw materials used by the Com- pany, totaling more than $2,000,000, were obtained outside the State of Ohio; and about 90 percent of its finished products, during the same period, totaling more than $5,000,000, were shipped outside the State of Ohio. ,The Company admits that-it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Local Union No. 52; Federal Labor Union No. 18907; Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Helpers International Union, Local No. 3; and International Association of Machinists, District 54, are labor organizations, ' Collectively the labor organizations which filed 9 (c) petitions herein are referred to as. the petitioning unions , ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANER COMPANY, INC. 785 affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to mem- bership employees of the Company. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America is a labor organization, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, 'admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTIONS CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company has refused to recognize any of the petitioning unions as the exclusive representative of the employees in respective, alleged appropriate units, in the absence of certification by the Board. Each petitioning union represents a substantial number of employees of the Company within the unit claimed by each to be appropriate.2 We find that questions affecting commerce have arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) aid (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT OR UNITS The Firemen contends that an appropriate unit consists of the "company's employees working as firemen." The Metal Polishers contends that an appropriate unit consists of the "company's employees working as polishers, buffers, platers, welders; and their helpers, and inspectors in such work, but excluding supervisory employees." 3 The Machinists contends that an appropriate unit consists of the "company's employees working as machinists, tool and diemakers, millwrights, diesetters, and generally all of its employees in the drill 2 In his Report dated August 22 , 1942 , the Regional Director reported with respect to, evidence submitted , concerning representation claims of the petitioning unions: Number of Number of such authori- Number of Name of petitioner genuine authorization Dated zations of em-ployees on employees in alleged cards sub- August 5. 1942 appropriate mitted , pay roll unit Firemen --___ ---_ 4 May 1942 3 3 Federal ------------------------------ 542 May 1942 300 341 Polishers---------------------------- 111 May 1942 30 36 Machinists ----------------- 187 May 1942 123 136 The Regional Director also reported that the United submitted evidence in various forms with respect to claims that it represents 22 employees . Of the 22 persons , 9 appear on the Company's pay roll of August 5, 1942. 3 At the hearing `the Trial , Examiner granted without objection a motion by counsel for the petitioning unions to delete the words "and other similar, kindred " and related classifications " from that portion of the Metal Polishers' petition describing the alleged appropriate unit 487498-42-vol. 44-50 786 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD press department, punch press department, automatic department, screw machine department, millwright department, ballbearing de- partment; tool room, grinding department and .die cast, department, and inspectors in these departments, but excluding supervisory employees." 4 The Federal contends that an appropriate unit consists of the "company's employees working in the motor department, assembly department, stock and store department, sewing department, service department, packers department, shipping and receiving department, and as truckers, sweepers, janitors, watchmen, inspectors, tiinekeep-' ers, and generally all other employees of the company not hereinafter excluded; but excluding from the foregoing all employees covered by other craft unions affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, all printers, pressmen, bookbinders, molders, patternmakers, painters, uniformed guards, office employees and supervisory em- ployees." The United contends that an appropriate unit consists of the Com- pany's production and maintenance employees, excluding supervisory and clerical employees, but including all the employees described in the petitions herein: In this proceeding the Company expressed no preference as to the unit or units appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining: In Hatter of Electric 'Vacmum Cleaner Company, Inc. 'and United Electrical c i Radio Workers of America, Local 7 ,905 a complaint proceeding involving, inter alia, a charge of refusal to-bargain col- lectively, the Company admitted the allegation in the complaint that all its production and maintenance employees, exclusive of clericalf and supervisory employees, constituted an appropriate unit:6 For sometime prior to 1935, the Company recognized the,Polishers, and dealt with it on an informal basis without a written contract. In June 1935, the Company entered into a 1-year written contract, containing a closed-shop'provision, with the Polishers, the Machinists, the Federal, the International Molders Union of North America, and the Patternmakers Association, herein collectively called the Affil- iates.' The contract was renewed for 1 year in 1936. In May 1937, the contract was again renewed to run for 1 year and from year to 4 At the hearing the Trial Examiner granted without, objection a motion by counsel for the petitioning, unions to delete the words "and other similar , kindred and related classifications " from that portion of the Metal Polishers' petition , describing the alleged'appiopriate unit. 618 N. L . R. B. 591 , enf d in 315 U S 685, rev'g 120 F . ( 2d), 611 ( C C A. 6). 6In the complaint proceeding , however , the Board did not resolve the controversy as to appropriate , unit created impart by conflicting claims of the American Fedeiation of Labor affiliates involved in the present case, since it found that the United did not represent a' majority of employees in the industrial unit or in any of the smaller units claimed by the American Federation of Labor affiliates. - At the time of the hearing in this case and for several months preceding , the Company had no molders or natters makers on its uav roll. ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANER COMPANY, INC. -787, year thereafter, with a 30=day cancelation clause. After the Supreme Court had rendered its opinion enforcing the Board's order in the proceeding referred to above," the Company canceled the contract on April '16, effective May 20, 1942, pursuant to its terms. The written contracts negotiated on behalf of the Affiliates by a joint committee, recognized "the Unions" as "the representative" of the employees, prescribed hours and general conditions of work, and set up a griev- ance procedure, but contained no wage scales.° In addition to the contracts involving the Polishers, the Machinists, and the Federal, the Company entered into a separate written contract, dated October 23, 1941, with the Firemen, containing a closed-shop provision, to take effect October 1, 1.941,' and to remain in force until May 20, 1942, and thereafter, with a 30-day cancelation clause. The Company also canceled this contract, pursuant to its terms, effective May 20, 1942.. Thus, at the time of the hearing there were no contracts in force, between the Company and any of the petitioning unions. The groups claimed to be appropriate units by the petitioning unions, except the Federal, each constitutes a definite and recognized craft. The Federal claims a normal semi-industrial unit. On the 8 On June 22, 1935, as indicated above, the Company and the Affiliates, representing a majority of the Company's employees, entered into a 1-year written collective bargaining agreement. As it supplement to the written contract the Company orally agreed that all new emp'oyees, i. e , those hired after the date of the contract, should be required to join the apprcpriate A F of L. affiliate This oral agreement was not revealed to the employees On July 6, 1936, when the Affiliates represented an increased majority of the employees, the written and oral agreements were extended to June 23, 1937; but again the employees were not informed of the oral agreement During March 19,17, a group of employees began to organize a local of the United Electrical and Radio Workers of America The Company thereupon attempted to forestall the organization of its plant by the United and, by unfair labor practices, assisted the Affiliates It compelled a number of old employees to join or retain membership in the Affiliates under penalty of dischaige; it di°chaiged an old employee because of his refusal to Jain the Affiliates ; it locked out all its employees for 2 weeks to enable the Affiliates to cement their ranks and prevent defections to the United ; and it infoimed its employees that under the July 1936 agreements all employees were required to be members of the Affiliates, which was not true Before reopening the plant, the Company' and the Affiliates abandoned the July 1936 agreements and, on April* 3, 1937, enteied into, an oral full closed-shop contract, which was s ibsequently reduced to writing, requiring membership in the Affiliates as a condition of employment In conformance with the new closed-shop contract the Company denied employment to 24 employees who had failed to obtain approval of or to Join, the- Affiliates. The Board found that by these actions the Company interfered with,, restrained, and coerced its employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed by, Section 7 of the Act, thereby violating Section 8 (1) ; that because of the antecedent assistance rendered to the Affiliates, the 1937 closed-shop contract was illegal under the proviso to Section 8 (3) of the Act; and that.tbe refusal to reemploy' the 24 employees in accordance with the closed-shop contract was, therefore, discriminatory and in violation of Section 8 (1) and (3) of the Act The Board's order required the Company (1) to cease and desist from its unfair labor practices, from giving effect-to the closed-shop provision of its contract with the Affiliates, and from giving effect to any provisions of that contract should the Board certify another labor organization as exclusive bargaining representative; (2) to offer reinstatement with back'pay to the employees discriminated against; and (3) to post notices. e Witnesses for the Company and the petitioning unions testified without contradiction that during the administration of the contracts the Company negotiated wage scales and dealt with each contracting union with respect to grievances separately on behalf of em-, ployees in each of the units claimed by the petitioning unions, respectively, to be aunronria te. 7$$ DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD other hand, the integrated character of, ,the Company's operations and the history of collective ba-rgaining indicate the appropriateness of an industrial unit which would include the foregoing groups. We are of the opinion, therefore,, that the Firemen, the Machinists, the Polishers, and those named in the petition of the Federal, in groups more expressly defined below, might properly constitute separate bargaining units, or that they might function as parts of a single industrial unit. Under these circumstances, we find that the deter- mining factor should be the desires of the employees in these groups.1° We shall order elections among the .employees of the, Company at its East Cleveland plant, within the groups described below : ' (a) The Company's employees working as firemen, to determine whether they desire to be represented by International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Local Union No. 52 (A. F. of L.), or by the United, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither; (b) The Company's employees working as' polishers, buffers, platers, welders, and their helpers, and inspectors in such work, but excluding supervisory employees, to determine whether they desire to be represented by Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Helpers International Union, Local No. 3 (A. F. of L), or by the United, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither; I(c) The Company's employees working as, machinists, tool and diemakers, millwrights, diesetters, and generally all of its employees in the drill press department, punch press department, automatic department, screw machine department, millwright department, ball- bearing department, tool room, grinding department and die cast department, and inspectors in these departments, but excluding super- visory employees, to determine whether they desire to be represented ,by International Association of Machinist's, District 54 (A. F. of L.), or by the United, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by- neither ; (d) The Company's employees working in the motor department,. assembly department, stock and store department, sewing depart- ment, service department, packers department, shipping and receiv- ing department, and, as truckers, sweepers, janitors, watchmen, in- spectors, timekeepers, and generally all other employees of the Com- pany not hereinafter excluded; but excluding from the foregoing all employees covered by other craft unions affiliated with the American Federation of' Labor, all printers, pressmen, bookbinders, molders,. patternmakers, painters, uniformed guards, office employees and 10 Matter-of The Globe Machine and Stamping Co. and Metal Polishers Union, Local No 3; Inte natronal Association of Machinists, District No 54; Federal' Labor Union 18788, and United Automobile Workers of America, 3 N. L. R B. 294, and subsequent cases ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANER COMPANY, INC. 789 supervisor- employees, to determine whether they desire to be repre- sented by Federal Labor Union No. 18907 (A. F. of L.), or by the United, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. As stated above, there will be-no final determination of the api propriate unit or units, pending the results of the, elections. In ac- ,cordance with our usual practice, such of the groups as choose a union •other than the United will constitute separate and distinct appropriate units; and such as choose the United will together constitute a single appropriate unit. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES The petitioning unions request certification upon the record, or separate elections in each unit. The Company expressed no prefer- ence as to the method to be employed in the determination of repre- sentatives. The United contends, however, that a fair election cannot be conducted at this time and that the petitions should be dismissed because. the effects of the Company's unfair labor practices, referred to above, extending over a period of years, have not been dissipated, and that the Company has not complied fully with the Board's order with respect to back pay for four employees." In support of its con- tention the United offered one witness who testified (1) that he is the only one of five employees reinstated who was then employed by the Company ; (2) that he was unsuccessfully solicited to join the American Federation of Labor the day he returned to work; (3) that he had been warned by a friendly employee not to continue working without joining the American Federation of Labor; and (4) that two unidentified non-employees refused to allow him to approach the Com- pany's plant about May 12 or 13, 1942. Under the circumstances and in view of the fact that investigation- by the Board's agents' discloses- no reason to postpone the elections, we shall proceed with an immediate determination of representatives. The petitioning unions and the ,Company desire that eligibility to vote in the elections be determined on the basis.of the Company's pay roll next preceding the Board's Di- rection of Elections. The United expressed no preference with re- spect to the eligibility date. We see no reason for departing from our usual piractice,of using a current pay-roll date. We shall direct that the employees. eligible to vote shall be those within the voting groups described above who were employed during the pay-roll pe- riod immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elections, ii The Board 's records indicate that the Company has complied fully with the Board's order, except as to back pay for four employees , and that the Company is willing to deposit In escrow with the Board funds sufficient to pay awards to the four employees'in amounts to"be' fixed by the Board and the courts. 790 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD subject to the limitations and additions set forth, in the Direction of Elections. - The petitioning unions contend that the name of the United should not be placed on the ballot in view of the absence of a showing that it represents, a substantial number of employees., In view of the fact that the United has shown that it represents some employees of the Company, and the history of unfair labor practices on-the part of the Company, we shall direct that the name of the United be placed upon the ballot, unless the United requests five (5) days after the,date of the Direction of Elections that its name be withdrawn.12 DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS By virtue of, and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant'to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with-Electric Vacuum Cleaner Company, Inc., East Cleveland, Ohio, elections by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days-from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Eighth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board and subject to Article III, Section 9, of. said Rules and Reg- ulations, among those employees who fall within the groups de- scribed below who were employed -by the Company at its East Cleveland. plant during the pay-roll. period immediately preceding the date of, this Direction of Elections, including employees in each group who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily, laid off, and excluding employees in each group who' have since quit or been discharged for cause : (a) The Company's employees working as firemen, to determine whether they desire to be represented by International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Local Union No. 52 (A. F. of L.), or by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America (C. I. 0.), for the' purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither; (b) The .Company's employees,, wdrking as polishers,,,-buffers, platers, welders, and their helpers, and inspectors in such work, .but excluding supervisory employees, to determine whether they desire " At the hearing the United expressed no preference as to a place for it on the-ballot in the event that the Board ordered balloting. ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANER COMPANY, INC. 791 to be represented by Metal Polishers , Buffers, Platers, and Helpers International Union, Local No. (A. F. of L.), or by the United, for the purposes of collective bargaining , or by neither; (c) The Company 's employees working as machinists , tool and diemakers ,- millwrights , diesetters , and generally all of its employees. in the drill press department , punch press department , automatic department , screw machine department , millwright department, ball- bearing department , tool room, grinding department and die cast department , and 'inspectors in these departments , but excluding supervisory employees , to determine whether they desire to be repre- sented by International Association of Machinists , ' District 54 (A. F. of L.), or by the United ', for the purposes of collective bar- gaining, or by neither ; and (d) The Company 's employees working in the motor department, assembly department , stock and store department , sewing depart- ment, service department , packers department , shipping and receiving department , and as truckers , sweepers , janitors, watchmen ,-inspectors, timekeepers , and generally all other employees of the Company not hereinafter excluded; but excluding from the foregoing all em- ployees covered by other craft unions affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, all printers , pressmen, bookbinders , molders, patternmakers , painters , uniformed guards, * office employees and supervisory employees , to determine whether they desire to be repre- rented by Federal Labor Union No. 18907 , (A. F. of L.), or by the United , for the purposes of collective bargaining , or by neither. MR. WM . M. LEIsERs0N took no part in the consideration of the- above Decision and Direction of Elections. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation