Labor Board v. Katz

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.

Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members

Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

Int. Longshoremen's Ass'n, Afl-Cio v. N.L.R.B

Finding no dispute as to the "fundamental principle of hornbook agency law" that governed, and applying the "two fairly conflicting views" standard only to the Board's application of the law to the facts

N.L.R.B. v. Dothan Eagle, Inc.