Eastern Steel Co.

18 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
  3. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
  4. Consolidation Coal Co. v. South-East Coal Co.

    402 U.S. 983 (1971)   Cited 153 times
    Holding that federal district court's decision on question of federal law was not a binding precedent for the Illinois courts
  5. Tex Tan Welhausen Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 819 (1970)   Cited 10 times
    Denying all vacation benefits because employees were not at work on December 31 or were absent more than 280 hours, where plan called for percentage payment according to annual salary
  6. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    585 F.2d 62 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 23 times
    Reopening of uneconomic plant would cost one million dollars plus operating loss of several hundred thousand dollars a year
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Daybreak Lodge Nursing & Convalescent Home, Inc.

    585 F.2d 79 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 11 times

    No. 77-2270. Argued July 25, 1978. Decided October 17, 1978. As Amended December 5, 1978. Barry F. Bevacqua, Julius M. Steiner, Pechner, Dorfman, Wolffe, Rounick Cabot, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Elliott Moore, Madge F. Jefferson, Robert Sewell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Before ADAMS, WEIS and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) has filed suit pursuant to 10(e) of the National

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Ramona's Mexican Food Products

    531 F.2d 390 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 10 times

    No. 73-2450. November 26, 1975. Patrick H. Hardin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (argued), for petitioner. George Jensen, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), for respondent. Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and EAST, Senior District Judge. Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. OPINION PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter Board), pursuant to Section 10(e), 29 U.S.C. ยง 160(e), of the National

  9. TEX TAN WELHAUSEN COMPANY v. N.L.R.B

    419 F.2d 1265 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 15 times

    No. 26338. November 21, 1969. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 12, 1970. Theo F. Weiss, Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., for petitioners. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., Joseph A. Yablonski, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, William Wachter, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for respondents. Fred

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Boyer Brothers, Inc.

    448 F.2d 555 (3d Cir. 1971)   Cited 13 times

    No. 17843. Argued June 11, 1971. Decided September 9, 1971. Corinna Metcalf, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Jack H. Weiner, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George V. Gardner, Asa Ambrister, Gardner Ambrister, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before STALEY and ADAMS, Circuit Judges, and GARTH, District Judge. OPINION OF THE COURT GARTH