Dunrail Construction Co., Inc.

15 Cited authorities

Interstate Circuit v. U.S.
306 U.S. 208 (1939) Cited 512 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"
I.A. of M. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 72 (1940) Cited 317 times
In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal Analyses
In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 178 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
N.L.R.B. v. Solo Cup Company
237 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1956) Cited 40 times
No. 15524. October 18, 1956. Rehearing Denied November 16, 1956. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Hasburgh, Kansas City, Mo. (Carl E. Enggas and Watson S. Marshall Enggas, Kansas City, Mo., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before WOODROUGH
Local 636, Plumbing Pipe v. N.L.R.B
287 F.2d 354 (D.C. Cir. 1961) Cited 27 times
Nos. 15665, 15707. Argued December 1, 1960. Decided January 19, 1961. Petition for Rehearing Denied March 22, 1961. Mr. Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Martin F. O'Donoghue and Thomas X. Dunn, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 15,665. Mr. Morton Namrow, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board,
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WTVJ, Inc.
268 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 16 times
Enforcing Board decision that found violation based on a theory of wrongdoing different from the theory relied upon by the ALJ
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lewis
246 F.2d 886 (9th Cir. 1957) Cited 16 times
In Lewis, a partnership that manufactured and sold shoes gradually transferred the manufacturing portion of its business to a corporation at a different location.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mayer
196 F.2d 286 (5th Cir. 1952) Cited 21 times
Ruling that employees have the right to designate a collective bargaining representative as well as the right to revoke such designation
N.L.R.B. v. Pallette Stone Corporation
283 F.2d 641 (2d Cir. 1960) Cited 4 times
No. 23, Docket 26114. Argued September 29, 1960. Decided October 28, 1960. Judith Bleich Kahn, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Arthur F. McGinn, Jr., Albany, N.Y., for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Dunrail Construction Co., Inc.

15 Cited authorities

Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

Enforcing Board decision that found violation based on a theory of wrongdoing different from the theory relied upon by the ALJ

In Lewis, a partnership that manufactured and sold shoes gradually transferred the manufacturing portion of its business to a corporation at a different location.

Ruling that employees have the right to designate a collective bargaining representative as well as the right to revoke such designation

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"