Drivers, Chauffeurs, and Helpers Local 639

38 Cited authorities

United States v. Mine Workers
330 U.S. 258 (1947) Cited 2,672 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a party may be punished for disobeying a court order even if the court was ultimately determined to lack jurisdiction to issue the order
U.S. v. Amer. Trucking Ass'ns
310 U.S. 534 (1940) Cited 1,677 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding the purpose of the statute should be followed when the literal words would be at odds "with the policy of the legislation as a whole"
Nardone v. United States
308 U.S. 338 (1939) Cited 1,591 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding once a defendant proves a government search is illegal, the government may avail itself of an opportunity to demonstrate the information came from an independent source and was not a product of the tainted search
Garner v. Teamsters Union
346 U.S. 485 (1953) Cited 690 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.
Giboney v. Empire Storage Co.
336 U.S. 490 (1949) Cited 696 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that speech integral to criminal conduct is not protected
United States v. Universal Corp.
344 U.S. 218 (1952) Cited 485 times
Holding that defendant's acts constituted a continuing course of conduct, subject only to one prosecution
Markham v. Cabell
326 U.S. 404 (1945) Cited 346 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Markham v. Cabell, 326 U.S. 404, 409, 66 S.Ct. 193, 195, the Court said, "The policy as well as the letter of the law is a guide to decision.
Hughes v. Superior Court
339 U.S. 460 (1950) Cited 285 times
In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.
Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union
353 U.S. 87 (1957) Cited 197 times
Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947
Auto. Workers v. Wis. Board
336 U.S. 245 (1949) Cited 209 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that issuance of injunction by state labor relations authority that orders state employees back to work does not violate Thirteenth Amendment because employees had the right to quit employment
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,317 times 84 Legal Analyses
Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

Drivers, Chauffeurs, and Helpers Local 639

38 Cited authorities

Holding that a party may be punished for disobeying a court order even if the court was ultimately determined to lack jurisdiction to issue the order

Finding the purpose of the statute should be followed when the literal words would be at odds "with the policy of the legislation as a whole"

Holding once a defendant proves a government search is illegal, the government may avail itself of an opportunity to demonstrate the information came from an independent source and was not a product of the tainted search

In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.

Holding that speech integral to criminal conduct is not protected

Holding that defendant's acts constituted a continuing course of conduct, subject only to one prosecution

In Markham v. Cabell, 326 U.S. 404, 409, 66 S.Ct. 193, 195, the Court said, "The policy as well as the letter of the law is a guide to decision.

In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.

Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

Holding that issuance of injunction by state labor relations authority that orders state employees back to work does not violate Thirteenth Amendment because employees had the right to quit employment

Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355