§

Douglas and Lomason Co.

151 N.L.R.B. 616 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Douglas and Lomason Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 64 times
    In Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.

  2. Union Carbide Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    310 F.2d 844 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times

    No. 14921. December 26, 1962. William C. Treanor and Henry Clifton, Jr., Buell, Clifton Truner, New York City, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B. Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before McALLISTER, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Carbide has petitioned this Court to review an order of the

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Douglas and Lomason Company

    333 F.2d 510 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 17533. June 26, 1964. Morton Namrow, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Elliott Moore and Paul Resnik, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief. Frank M. Swift, of Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee, Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., made argument for respondent and Donald D. Smith, of Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee Hancock,